Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

04-12-2023 08:32

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonjour, récolte réalisée au sol dans un parc,

01-12-2023 21:54

Marian Jagers Marian Jagers

Does anyone recognize this species? Apothecia in

04-12-2023 10:01

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum participants, On a thin twig of Myrica

03-12-2023 19:21

ruiz Jose antonio

Hola a todos, en un talud cercano a un riachuelo,

28-11-2023 23:10

Villalonga Paco

On basic soil in humid bank, Teruel, Spain, around

02-12-2023 21:21

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir, Récolte en milieu incendié, apothécie

25-11-2023 14:49

Kees van Oorde Kees van Oorde

Very small fruiting bodies on affected leaves. Fou

30-11-2023 14:33

Béatrice Senn-Irlet

alll issues of Mycologia Helvetica (1983-2000) are

28-01-2014 10:50

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I'm looking for these three standard references

25-11-2023 18:14

Danny Newman Danny Newman

higher resolution images available at inaturalist.

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Marc Detollenaere, 16-09-2023 16:21
Marc DetollenaereDuring a walk in a mixed forest , one of my friends found a number of small yellow to orange cups of about 2-3mm on naked soil.
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?

 Marc
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
François Bartholomeeusen, 17-09-2023 15:48
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Hi Marc,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,

François

dd. 4/10/2020

(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7

dd. 22/112022

(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8

dd. 29/11/2022

15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9

Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 17-09-2023 18:39
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Your collection is partly immature, but the ornamentation visible on the third picture clearly points to A. bicucullata
Marc Detollenaere, 17-09-2023 21:01
Marc Detollenaere
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Nicolas and Francois,

Thank you very much for your comments

Marc