Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

02-07-2025 18:45

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

02-07-2025 17:26

Yanick BOULANGER

BonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo

02-07-2025 09:32

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for

30-06-2025 16:56

Lydia Koelmans

Please can anyone tell me the species name of the

01-07-2025 23:37

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and

30-06-2025 12:09

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found

30-06-2025 06:57

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro

30-06-2025 19:05

ALAIN BOUVIER

Bonjour à toutes et à tousJe cherche à lire l'a

30-06-2025 14:45

Götz Palfner Götz Palfner

This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood

25-06-2025 16:56

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Marc Detollenaere, 16-09-2023 16:21
Marc DetollenaereDuring a walk in a mixed forest , one of my friends found a number of small yellow to orange cups of about 2-3mm on naked soil.
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?

 Marc
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
François Bartholomeeusen, 17-09-2023 15:48
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Hi Marc,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,

François

dd. 4/10/2020

(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7

dd. 22/112022

(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8

dd. 29/11/2022

15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9

Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 17-09-2023 18:39
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Your collection is partly immature, but the ornamentation visible on the third picture clearly points to A. bicucullata
Marc Detollenaere, 17-09-2023 21:01
Marc Detollenaere
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Nicolas and Francois,

Thank you very much for your comments

Marc