Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

11-02-2026 22:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

12-02-2026 14:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810

11-02-2026 19:28

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

10-02-2026 18:54

Erik Van Dijk

Does anyone has an idea what fungus species this m

09-02-2026 20:10

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2

09-02-2026 14:46

Anna Klos

Goedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti

09-02-2026 11:42

Ã…ge Oterhals

Hi forum, I found this Lachnum on old hardwood tw

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Marc Detollenaere, 16-09-2023 16:21
Marc DetollenaereDuring a walk in a mixed forest , one of my friends found a number of small yellow to orange cups of about 2-3mm on naked soil.
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?

 Marc
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
  • message #76928
François Bartholomeeusen, 17-09-2023 15:48
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Hi Marc,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,

François

dd. 4/10/2020

(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7

dd. 22/112022

(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8

dd. 29/11/2022

15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9

Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 17-09-2023 18:39
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Your collection is partly immature, but the ornamentation visible on the third picture clearly points to A. bicucullata
Marc Detollenaere, 17-09-2023 21:01
Marc Detollenaere
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Nicolas and Francois,

Thank you very much for your comments

Marc