![](/images/nonlu.png)
16-07-2024 18:32
![Andgelo Mombert](/uploads/user_vgn/Mombert-0001.jpg)
Bonsoir, Un discomycète sur Liochlaena lanceolat
![](/images/nonlu.png)
17-07-2024 16:29
![Andgelo Mombert](/uploads/user_vgn/Mombert-0001.jpg)
Hello,A colleague found an unknown fungus on the s
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-01-2022 16:36
Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
![](/images/nonlu.png)
24-08-2020 13:00
![Yulia Lytvynenko](/uploads/user_vgn/Lytvynenko-0001.jpg)
Dear friends.Looking for a copy of the following w
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-07-2024 14:29
![Viktorie Halasu](/uploads/user_vgn/Halasu-0001.jpg)
Hello, a thin-fleshed Mollisia on a monocot stem
Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Marc Detollenaere,
16-09-2023 16:21
![Marc Detollenaere](/uploads/user_vgn/Detollenaere-0001.jpg)
The fruitbodies I took home were still young and contained mostly oval spores without ornementation of 12-12.5x7.5µ, with 2 large guttules. I also found a few spores with prominent crests. The spores he sent me had also high ridges and had the same size.No reaction with Lugol.
The spore size matches with bicucullata but the paraphyses bent over like a cane what is not describe in Van Vooren 2014. Is Aleuria congrex with rather small spores an option?
Marc
François Bartholomeeusen,
17-09-2023 15:48
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Hi Marc,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,
Herewith the measurements (without ornamentation) of my three finds of A. cogrex. All measurements were done in water and from mature spores outside the asci!
Best regards,
François
dd. 4/10/2020
(14) 14.8 - 15.8 (16.2) × (8.3) 8.5 - 9.5 (9.7) µm
Q = 1.6 - 1.7 (1.9) ; N = 16
Me = 15.2 × 9.1 µm ; Qe = 1.7
dd. 22/112022
(13.9) 14.5 - 16.1 (16.5) × (7.5) 7.9 - 8.9 (9.1) µm
Q = 1.7 - 1.9 (2.1) ; N = 20
Me = 15.2 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.8
dd. 29/11/2022
15 - 16.9 (17.2) × 7.9 - 8.8 (9.1) µm
Q = (1.8) 1.81 - 2.1 (2.2) ; N = 12
Me = 16.1 × 8.4 µm ; Qe = 1.9
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
17-09-2023 18:39
![Nicolas VAN VOOREN](/uploads/user_vgn/VAN-VOOREN-0001.jpg)
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Your collection is partly immature, but the ornamentation visible on the third picture clearly points to A. bicucullata
Marc Detollenaere,
17-09-2023 21:01
![Marc Detollenaere](/uploads/user_vgn/Detollenaere-0001.jpg)
Re : Aleuria bicucullata or congrex?
Nicolas and Francois,
Thank you very much for your comments
Marc
Thank you very much for your comments
Marc