09-12-2025 12:06
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Je recherche l'article concernant Hypobryo
07-12-2025 16:07
Arnold BüschlenHallo, ich habe in einer Moos-Aufsammlung (epiphy
08-12-2025 21:04
Mark Stevens"Hello everyone,I'm relatively new to microscopy (
08-12-2025 18:59
Lothar Krieglsteiner
.. found by a seminar-participant, I do not know t
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
16-03-2014 22:00
Ralph Vandiest
Hello,I found this species a few months ago but ha
08-12-2025 13:39
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10572899
Lachnum subvirgineum
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
11-03-2009 00:00
Buenas nochesTengo varias recolecciones de Lachnum virgineum (http://www.micobotanicajaen.com/Revista/Articulos/Fichas/Fichas008/LachnumVirgineum.htm), pero en esta ocasión la microscopía es algo distinta, sobre todo en cuanto a las puntas de los pelos, que son bastante engrosados, y he pensado que podría tratarse de Lachnum subvirgineum. Recolectado en Tenerife (Islas Canarias) en bosque "Monteverde": laurel (Laurus novocanariensis)y brezo (Erica arborea). Ver pdf adjunto.
Gracias,
____________________________________________
Good night
I have several records of Lachnum virgineum (http://www.micobotanicajaen.com/Revista/Articulos/Fichas/Fichas008/LachnumVirgineum.htm), but this one has a little different microscopial characters, because it has a clavate tips hairs. I think it could be Lachnum subvirgineum. Record from Tenerife (Canary Islands), in "Monteverde" forest: laurel (Laurus novocanariensis) and brezo (Erica arborea). See attached pdf file.
Thank you,
7043.pdf
Hans-Otto Baral,
11-03-2009 23:25
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Miguel
yes, I believe this is L. subvirgineum. Why do you write that croziers are also absent? I see very well the croziers in most of your images. The hairs are also shorter in L: subvirgineum compared to L. virgineum. Do you have no possibility to study your specimens when fresh? The micros are all in dead state, and therefore you loose the VBs which are characteristic of quite a lot of Lachnum species.
Zotto
yes, I believe this is L. subvirgineum. Why do you write that croziers are also absent? I see very well the croziers in most of your images. The hairs are also shorter in L: subvirgineum compared to L. virgineum. Do you have no possibility to study your specimens when fresh? The micros are all in dead state, and therefore you loose the VBs which are characteristic of quite a lot of Lachnum species.
Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
12-03-2009 14:33
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Zotto, thank you very much.
Sorry, but, where have you read that "croziers are also absent"? At the second photo in the attached pdf I say "with croziers (right)". I can't find that text.
I used to stay at Tenerife during a week-nine days in June and another week-nine days in December, and I try to come back with a lot of fresh material, but the first days material is difficult to mantein in good condition. Another times I bring the funghi in fresh conditions but I have no time to process all of fresh material, like this L. subvirgineum, because I though it would be L. virgineum again, so perhaps I took more attention to other species before this. Sorry.
Thank you again
Sorry, but, where have you read that "croziers are also absent"? At the second photo in the attached pdf I say "with croziers (right)". I can't find that text.
I used to stay at Tenerife during a week-nine days in June and another week-nine days in December, and I try to come back with a lot of fresh material, but the first days material is difficult to mantein in good condition. Another times I bring the funghi in fresh conditions but I have no time to process all of fresh material, like this L. subvirgineum, because I though it would be L. virgineum again, so perhaps I took more attention to other species before this. Sorry.
Thank you again
Hans-Otto Baral,
12-03-2009 18:34
Re:Lachnum subvirgineum
Dear Miguel
sorry, I must have been overworked yesterday. Now everything is o.k. :-)
I understand of course the problem with fresh specimens from far away. When I see the fresh macro I think why is the micro so dead. But now I see there are some weeks between. My collections from Tenerife from about 1978 are largely still unexamined :-(
Zotto
sorry, I must have been overworked yesterday. Now everything is o.k. :-)
I understand of course the problem with fresh specimens from far away. When I see the fresh macro I think why is the micro so dead. But now I see there are some weeks between. My collections from Tenerife from about 1978 are largely still unexamined :-(
Zotto