Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

19-11-2025 23:21

carl van den broeck carl van den broeck

Dear guestIn Waardamme, Belgium, I found dozens of

19-11-2025 20:51

Andreas Millinger Andreas Millinger

Good evening,found this species on a felled trunk

19-11-2025 13:04

Bruno Coué Bruno Coué

Bonjour,je  sollicite votre avis pour la récote

17-11-2025 21:46

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois pourrissant de feuillu

18-11-2025 18:26

David Malloch David Malloch

I am trying to locate the article, Müller, E. 195

16-11-2025 21:09

Robin Isaksson Robin Isaksson

Anyone recognize this acc. to pictures.? Found on

18-11-2025 13:59

Nogueira Héctor

November 14, 2025 Brazuelo (León) SPAIN Hymenosc

17-11-2025 19:14

herman lambert

Apothécie discoïde 0.6 cm diam., orangeFace hymÃ

17-11-2025 21:57

Philippe PELLICIER

Bonjour,Récolté sur bois de feuillu mort dur, no

14-11-2025 16:26

Marian Jagers Marian Jagers

Hello everyone, On dead wood of Cytisus scoparius

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Bryoscyphus?
Georges Greiff, 06-01-2021 14:22
Hi All,

I found a whitish species on sandy soil with Bryum capillare and Ceratodon purpureus. I believed it was Bryoscyphus dicrani in the field but the (unliberated) ascospores do not seem to fit that taxon and the paraphyses appear to lack the distinctive vacuolar bodies present in many fresh collections of Bryoscyphus spp. I wonder if it fits Bryoscyphus "rhombispora" nom prov. Baral. I do not have enough good material for a good quantitative analysis but the ascospore dimensions are approx. 17-20 x 8-10, which seems too large. Found in South England.

Any thoughts or resources would be greatly appreciated. I can't seem to find Zotto's image gallery, which I recall has excellent images of Bryoscyphus spp.

Thanks,

Georges
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
  • message #66867
Georges Greiff, 06-01-2021 14:25
Re : Bryoscyphus?
Ah, I think it is Mniaecia nivea...
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 06-01-2021 14:47
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Bryoscyphus?
Yes, this seems more likely (or a related form). The paraphyses are not multiguttulate as they should be in Bryoscyphus.
Best, Lothar