04-11-2025 09:07
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
                                    03-11-2025 21:34
                Edvin Johannesen
                These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
                                    28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
                                    03-11-2025 16:30
                Hans-Otto Baral
                Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
                                    28-10-2025 19:33
                Nicolas Suberbielle
                Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
                                    31-10-2025 09:19
                Lothar Krieglsteiner
                Can somebody provide me with a file of:Rogerson CT
                                    09-08-2025 13:13
                Maria Plekkenpol
                Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth
I'm again in trouble to classify specimens in Hysteriaceae. In May last year at the topic
"Hysterobrevium mori (?) on Juniperus" - http://www.ascofrance.fr/search_forum/42906
I thought to have found Hysterobrevium mori. More recently, I found other specimens, which seem to be indeed of that species, by the spores configuration and dimensons. I returned to the place the first observation mentioned above and found new specimens. Now, I have no longer doubts that they must be something other than H. mori. I looked again to the E. Boehm´s webpage:
http://www.eboehm.com/hysteriaceae.html
and conclude that my specimens must belong to the genus Oedohysterium, must probably to a species close to O. pulchrum or even itself. The fact is that, the hymenium shows what can be describe as a red pigmentation as well as the spores, which have (5-) 6 transversal septa and most of them have a longitudinal septum at the 3rd cell from the apex, some of are also longitudinally septated at adjacent cells, and some have no longitudinal septa at all. All these feature fit quite well in the above mentioned species, but the spores dimensions, more precisely their widht does not fit. I got the following values:
(22.3) 22.8 - 26.8 (27.3) × (6.3) 6.7 - 7.7 (7.8) µm
Q = (2.9) 3.1 - 3.7 (4.1) ; N = 30
Me = 24.7 × 7.2 µm ; Qe = 3.4
whereas the values given at eboehm.com are:
22 - 25 (-27) x 5-6 µm.
Can anyone give an help?
Thanks in advance,
zaca
P.S.: I saw that Alain Gardiennet recently posted on the Database another species of Oedohysterium, O. insidens, whose spores are only tranversely septated and bigger (I presume).
Hi Zaca,
Your analysis is exact : it's an Oedohysterium very very closed to O. pulchrum.
Did you colpare with the the paper Checa et al. 2007 ?
Alain
I add scale on one photo of O. insidens
Thanks for the confirmation of my analysis. I could not access the paper of Checa et al. (2007).
Best regards,
zaca
                Checa & al. 2007- I do not have it either :-)
Regads, Lothar
                Checa et al. Some new hysteriaceous Fungi from Costa Rica, Mycologia, 99(2), 2007, pp. 285–290.
Ami Alain, il faut citer tes références pour les copains.
but paid. Since this research is not financed I will not pay for it.
                Regards,
zaca
                Thanks a lot, Francois!
Best regards, Lothar
                






 Ascus