Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

01-04-2009 22:05

Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Je ne me décide pas par un type, trouvée en feui

01-04-2009 05:21

herman lambert

Petites pézizes poussant sur mousse au pied d'un

30-03-2009 20:37

Gernot Friebes

Hello, on Saturday I found this pyrenomycet on

30-03-2009 19:10

Stip Helleman Stip Helleman

Bonsoir a tout, Has anyone for me the article abo

29-03-2009 18:14

Alain GARDIENNET Alain GARDIENNET

Bonjour, L'article que je recherche est exacteme

29-03-2009 15:18

Gernot Friebes

Hello, here is my second pyrenomycet I found ye

29-03-2009 15:10

Gernot Friebes

Hello forum, it's my first post here and I'm st

29-03-2009 13:53

roman vargas alberto

Salut J'ai pensé que Geoglossum umbratile po

27-03-2009 18:53

Alain BRISSARD

Bonjour à tous Ma documentation limitée m'amè

25-03-2009 20:58

Pablo Chacón Pablo Chacón

Bonnes nuits. Aide pour commencer. J'ai trouv

« < 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 > »
Pyrenopeziza ?
Maren Kamke, 06-05-2015 18:30
Maren KamkeHello everybody,
I found this Pyrenopeziza? species on Phalaris arundinacea last weekend.
Apothecia 0,5 mm in diameter with inrolled margin, whitish-hyalin, sessile.
Outer excipulum hyaline, textura angularis to textura globosa,
with difficult to identify, hyaline margincells, slightly clavate at the apex, up to 30 µm long.
Paraphyses simple, up to 2 µm wide at the apex without content. Asci with croziers 39-42 x 5 µm, IKl+ blue (Calycina-type), spores hyaline, clavate, oil 0-1, (9-11) 9,88 x 2,57 (2-3) µm.
Regards
Maren
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 06-05-2015 19:54
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?

Hello Maren,


I do not think this is a Pyrenopeziza. Unfortunately, the views of the paraphyses are rather blurred, but I suggest they contain vacuolar bodies. So, it could (should) be a Mollisia. Maybe, it could be M. hydrophila which has similar spores and appearance. But surely, more competent people will write there opinion.


Yours, Lothar

Maren Kamke, 06-05-2015 20:17
Maren Kamke
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hello Lothar,
it was very difficult to get a clear picture of the paraphyses at all, this one is with 500x.
There maybe some vacuolar bodies present, but none refractive. I don't think it is M. hydrophila because there are no crystals in the medulla.
Regards
Maren
  • message #35654
Hans-Otto Baral, 07-05-2015 10:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hallo zusammen

I also think it is a Pyrenopeziza, the paraphysis contents are now clear.
On monocots I have nothing with such clavate spores, however.

I assume this is a rather sparse collection? All apos looking like this?

Zotto
Maren Kamke, 07-05-2015 19:24
Maren Kamke
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hallo Zotto,
ich habe an einem anderen Halm noch eine Gruppe mit Fruchtkörpern fotografieren können. Pyrenopeziza psilocistelloides Baral sp. prov. kann es wohl wegen der septierten Randhaare nicht sein, oder?
Gruß, Maren
  • message #35694
Hans-Otto Baral, 07-05-2015 20:36
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Ohje, dieses Ding, da kann ich mich sogar noch erinnern. Damals machte ich oft nur Beschreibungen ganz ohne Illustration, schade! Da gab es noch keine Digicams (1989).

Also das war schon deutlich haarig, und ob es wirklich eine Pyrenopeziza war? War auf ?Deschampsia aus Gerardmer.