Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

08-05-2013 16:16

hannie wijers

Nearly a year ago I found this peziza-like on a be

05-05-2013 20:19

Maren Kamke Maren Kamke

Hello,I found this one on Quercus sp., I think. I

06-05-2013 21:35

Spooren Marco Spooren Marco

Hello,I'am looking for some lterature (about coelo

10-03-2013 11:10

Björn Wergen Björn Wergen

Hi again,do you also think that this collection ca

08-05-2013 14:52

hannie wijers

On hardung I found this vack frb. At first I could

07-05-2013 11:54

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Another Mollisia? in wood without bark, no more th

06-05-2013 10:55

Yannick Mourgues Yannick Mourgues

Bonjour à tous.Qui aurait ces docs en pdf ? Ou qu

04-05-2013 22:20

Chris Yeates Chris Yeates

Bonsoir tousthere seems to have been a glut of cop

05-05-2013 14:25

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody Here's already my next problem:

06-05-2013 00:07

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Je sollicite votre aide pour cette réco

« < 1295 1296 1297 1298 1299 > »
Pyrenopeziza ?
Maren Kamke, 06-05-2015 18:30
Maren KamkeHello everybody,
I found this Pyrenopeziza? species on Phalaris arundinacea last weekend.
Apothecia 0,5 mm in diameter with inrolled margin, whitish-hyalin, sessile.
Outer excipulum hyaline, textura angularis to textura globosa,
with difficult to identify, hyaline margincells, slightly clavate at the apex, up to 30 µm long.
Paraphyses simple, up to 2 µm wide at the apex without content. Asci with croziers 39-42 x 5 µm, IKl+ blue (Calycina-type), spores hyaline, clavate, oil 0-1, (9-11) 9,88 x 2,57 (2-3) µm.
Regards
Maren
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
  • message #35647
Lothar Krieglsteiner, 06-05-2015 19:54
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?

Hello Maren,


I do not think this is a Pyrenopeziza. Unfortunately, the views of the paraphyses are rather blurred, but I suggest they contain vacuolar bodies. So, it could (should) be a Mollisia. Maybe, it could be M. hydrophila which has similar spores and appearance. But surely, more competent people will write there opinion.


Yours, Lothar

Maren Kamke, 06-05-2015 20:17
Maren Kamke
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hello Lothar,
it was very difficult to get a clear picture of the paraphyses at all, this one is with 500x.
There maybe some vacuolar bodies present, but none refractive. I don't think it is M. hydrophila because there are no crystals in the medulla.
Regards
Maren
  • message #35654
Hans-Otto Baral, 07-05-2015 10:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hallo zusammen

I also think it is a Pyrenopeziza, the paraphysis contents are now clear.
On monocots I have nothing with such clavate spores, however.

I assume this is a rather sparse collection? All apos looking like this?

Zotto
Maren Kamke, 07-05-2015 19:24
Maren Kamke
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Hallo Zotto,
ich habe an einem anderen Halm noch eine Gruppe mit Fruchtkörpern fotografieren können. Pyrenopeziza psilocistelloides Baral sp. prov. kann es wohl wegen der septierten Randhaare nicht sein, oder?
Gruß, Maren
  • message #35694
Hans-Otto Baral, 07-05-2015 20:36
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Pyrenopeziza ?
Ohje, dieses Ding, da kann ich mich sogar noch erinnern. Damals machte ich oft nur Beschreibungen ganz ohne Illustration, schade! Da gab es noch keine Digicams (1989).

Also das war schon deutlich haarig, und ob es wirklich eine Pyrenopeziza war? War auf ?Deschampsia aus Gerardmer.