09-08-2025 13:13
Maria Plekkenpol
Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apoth
09-08-2025 17:52
Henri KoskinenHello, would you say this is Peziza or Pachyella?
31-07-2025 16:32
Andreas Gminder
Dear collegues,today I found on a very fresh fire
06-08-2025 08:56
Antonio Ezquerro Antoñana
Hola a todos, Me gustaría saber qué opinan sobre
12-02-2012 11:31
Hans-Otto Baral
Hi allI am quite sure that nobody has a pdf of thi
02-08-2025 12:35
éric ROMERO
Bonjour tous, J'ai trouvé sur pétiole de Fraxin
02-08-2025 17:21
Andgelo Mombert
Bonjour,Je recherche la description et la planche
30-07-2025 20:52
Bohan JiaHi together, I've been looking posts in AscoFra
30-07-2025 10:12
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
30-07-2025 18:06
Stefan JakobssonOn a decorticated twig of Alnus incana on moist so
Anthracobia but which one?
Maria Plekkenpol,
09-08-2025 13:13
Hello,Yesterday I found these on burnt soil. Apothecia orange, largest 3 mm. Cupshaped at first, then flattening. Very vaguely hairs to be seen, but under the microscope I really had to search and make several preparations before I found them. Asci 8 spored, spores biguttulate, 17,4 - 20,2 x 9,5 - 10,8. Parafyses not uncinate, filled with darker orange and apices up to 9,4 µ.
Because of the fact that finding the hairs was difficult I hope I measured them correctly. Size hairs margin 58 - 80 x 5 - 10.
Following the key I arrive at A. nitida, but of course I am not sure :).
What would be your opinion? Thank you already for your help!
Greetings, Maria
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
09-08-2025 16:41
Re : Anthracobia but which one?
Are you sure about the spore width?
It seems too wide based on your picture.
It seems too wide based on your picture.
Maria Plekkenpol,
09-08-2025 16:58
Re : Anthracobia but which one?
Hi Nicolas,
I did measure from the outer walls ... if that should be the inner walls than I have to measure again. If that is how it should be done, the sizes are correct.
I did measure from the outer walls ... if that should be the inner walls than I have to measure again. If that is how it should be done, the sizes are correct.
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
09-08-2025 17:17
Re : Anthracobia but which one?
Well, if the dimensions of ascospores are correct, as well as "hairs" size, this points to A. melaloma, but the latter has conspicuous "hairs". That doesn't seem the case for this collection.
The other option is A. macrocystis, but your collection has too wide ascospores...
The other option is A. macrocystis, but your collection has too wide ascospores...
Maria Plekkenpol,
09-08-2025 18:20
Re : Anthracobia but which one?
Hi Nicolas,
First: thanks for your help and responses!
There are/were indeed no conspicuous hairs, in quite a few preparations (I didn't give up soon :)).
If I understand you correctly the spores do have to be measured from outerwall to outerwall?Because if that is not the case, I have been measuring my spores wrongly for years...
Looking at a determination of A. macrocystis from Enrique Rubio (2018) I see spore measures 16,5 - 19,2 x 10 - 12?
I also read your comment on a recent post saying that you are currently diving into Anthracobia?If you want me to sent you the material, it is still fresh.
Greetings, Maria
First: thanks for your help and responses!
There are/were indeed no conspicuous hairs, in quite a few preparations (I didn't give up soon :)).
If I understand you correctly the spores do have to be measured from outerwall to outerwall?Because if that is not the case, I have been measuring my spores wrongly for years...
Looking at a determination of A. macrocystis from Enrique Rubio (2018) I see spore measures 16,5 - 19,2 x 10 - 12?
I also read your comment on a recent post saying that you are currently diving into Anthracobia?If you want me to sent you the material, it is still fresh.
Greetings, Maria