Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

12-02-2026 14:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810

11-02-2026 22:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

11-02-2026 19:28

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

10-02-2026 18:54

Erik Van Dijk

Does anyone has an idea what fungus species this m

09-02-2026 20:10

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

The first 6 tables show surely one species with 2

09-02-2026 14:46

Anna Klos

Goedemiddag, Op donderdag 5 februari vonden we ti

09-02-2026 11:42

Ã…ge Oterhals

Hi forum, I found this Lachnum on old hardwood tw

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana