Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

26-11-2025 18:13

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu

21-11-2025 15:22

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found in moss, forest with Pinus halepensis. Dime

25-11-2025 14:24

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522

24-11-2025 18:17

ruiz Jose

Hola en madera, quizás de alnus. Esporas(12.1) 12

25-11-2025 11:03

Mick Peerdeman

Hi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so

29-06-2016 18:06

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonjour,Trouvé sur branches mortes cortiquées de

24-11-2025 15:23

Arnold Büschlen

Hallo, auf einer offenen Kiesfläche am Rande ein

18-11-2025 18:26

David Malloch David Malloch

I am trying to locate the article, Müller, E. 195

23-11-2025 11:16

Bohan Jia

Hi,  I found small discs growing on dead stem of

21-11-2025 10:56

Christopher Engelhardt Christopher Engelhardt

Very small (~0,5 mm) white ascos, found yesterday

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana