Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

26-10-2025 13:39

Joaquin Martin

Hi,I found this fungus in a mixed forest of spruce

26-10-2025 12:01

Louis DENY

Hello forum,Trouvé à Belfort (400m) sur tige her

23-10-2025 20:59

Patrice TANCHAUD

Bonsoir, est-ce que quelqu'un posséderait un com

24-10-2025 14:50

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Oct. 2025

24-10-2025 03:11

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this fungus growing on decaying conifer wo

20-10-2025 09:36

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for the following article:Bene

07-09-2025 08:19

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Tiny pinkish discomycetes, photographed and

21-10-2025 23:13

F. JAVIER BALDA JAUREGUI

Hello to everyone.Did you think it could, be a pyx

22-10-2025 06:43

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, I'm having some difficulty with this Orbi

22-10-2025 14:45

Lukas Verboom

Dear all,I collected this in the Netherlands, on t

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Mollisia ligni?
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 17:34
Hi all:

Ascomycete collected on hardwood, probably oak.
From the data, I think that it may be Mollisia ligni, but I would like someone to confirm me.


Thank you,


Susana

  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
  • message #28804
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 17:55
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Yes,  agree. The spores sound a bit large, I remember them shorter.
Martin Bemmann, 15-04-2014 19:17
Martin Bemmann
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Hi Susana and Zotto,

I had a collection of M.l. on oak where I wrote down 9.2-12.7x1.8-2.8 µm for the spores, close to Susana's figures.

Regards
Martin
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-04-2014 21:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Mollisia ligni?
The rather many measurements I have were between 6-9 and 7.5-10.5 x 2-2.8 µm

Zotto
Enrique Rubio, 15-04-2014 21:12
Enrique Rubio
Re : Mollisia ligni?
6.2-9.7 x 2.1-2.7 in my collection on Sorbus (Ascofrance card)
Garcia Susana, 15-04-2014 22:46
Re : Mollisia ligni?
Thanks to all three

I saw that the spore size was large, but the number of measures was low and therefore not very representative.


Regards


Susana