Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

05-02-2022 19:11

Chris Yeates Chris Yeates

Bonsoir Am I correct in thinking that while Tapes

04-02-2022 05:50

Suhaib  Firdous Yatoo Suhaib Firdous Yatoo

on horse dungCleistothecia solitary, pyeriform, gr

04-02-2022 00:16

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

These colonies of beautiful conidia grew on sporod

01-02-2022 16:18

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hola.Un Dothideomyceto recolectado el 9 de Enero s

31-01-2022 07:11

Zuidland Peter

Found on wood in Mountain Ash(Eucalyptus) forest;

03-02-2022 16:17

Hans-Otto Baral Hans-Otto Baral

Hi does someone have access to this? Agyrium ruf

03-02-2022 11:44

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

me mandan el material seco de Galicia España, rec

03-02-2022 14:46

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour, Après le choc du départ de Christian L

31-01-2022 18:38

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

Hello, I'm trying to identify this tiny white dis

01-02-2022 12:10

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia,  recolecta

« < 262 263 264 265 266 > »
Tapesia
Chris Yeates, 05-02-2022 19:11
Chris Yeates
Bonsoir

Am I correct in thinking that while Tapesia is no longer considered to be a justifiable genus v. Mollisia, there are a number of combinations which have not yet been made? I am assuming that older combinations in Mollisia can be treated as the valid current name - e.g. M. evilescens (P. Karst.) Mussat, and M. fusca (Pers.) P. Karst. ?

Also I am assuming that a new specific name would be needed for Tapesia cinerella Rehm, which seems not to be conspecific with Mollisia cinerella Sacc.

Clarification welcomed!

Amitiés, Chris
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 07-02-2022 08:57
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tapesia
Hi Chris.
Tapesia is a rejected name, against Mollisia, as indicated in the Appendix III of Shenzhen Code.
As a consequence, all validly published names in Tapesia should be combined in Mollisia, except if such combination already exists.
As Tapesia cinerella Rehm does not share the same type of Mollisia cinerella Sacc., a new name is required to combine it in Mollisia.

Chris Yeates, 07-02-2022 16:54
Chris Yeates
Re : Tapesia
Un grand merci Nicolas

C'est exactement comme ça que j'ai interprété la situation.

Amitiés,Chris


Hans-Otto Baral, 07-02-2022 22:37
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Tapesia
Yes, some new combinations would be necessary. The only thing is whether the species in question is a good one or perhaps only a synonym of another. Many such synonymies are still to be discovered, and Mollisia with its high species diversity is a good example, either between teleomorphs or between teleomorphs and an anamorph that might have priority.