20-12-2025 23:08
Patrice TANCHAUDBonsoir, récolte sur sol sablonneux dans l'arriÃ
21-12-2025 09:32
Hello.A tiny ascomycete found embedded in wood in
20-12-2025 15:47
Mirek GrycHi.These grew on pine wood that was heavily covere
18-12-2025 21:17
Pol DebaenstThe identification took me to Byssonectria deformi
15-12-2025 07:09
Danny Newman
indet. Rutstroemiaceae sp. on unk. fallen leavesMc
19-12-2025 10:10
Patrice TANCHAUDBonjour, récolte réalisée en milieu dunaire, a
18-12-2025 17:23
Bruno Coué
Bonjour,je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur c
Vibrissea flavovirens?
Stefan Jakobsson,
08-07-2022 02:34
Can it be confirmed that this is V. flavovirens?
Hans-Otto Baral,
08-07-2022 08:39
Re : Vibrissea flavovirens?
I think the colour is not so important. Since I do not have an overniew on available measurements, I cannot easily say if such small measurements ever occurred, but I do not know a further species with these characters.
Stefan Jakobsson,
08-07-2022 11:49
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-07-2022 09:42
Re : Vibrissea flavovirens?
Thanks for this survey. In my key I wrote for flavovirens:
asci *260-343 x 6.5-8.8 µm
spores *125-195 x 1.2-1.8 µm
spore fragments *(27–)30-42(–51) µm
Ascus measurements in your table are probably mostly in dead state, but the differences to living asci are apparently not very high.
In the type of V. minima Velen. on Salix, which I restudied and considered a synonym, I found asci +154 x 4.8-5.3 and spore fragments 27-48 µm. So your spore fragments are a bit shorter than usual.
In a collection from Sheffield (HB 9520) I measured spores *125-134 µm long (like yours), breaking into 4 part spores of *27-38 x 1.3-1.6 µm, 4-celled (ascus length not measured).
In the case there is a continuum of measurements among collections, I suspect that living asci much shorter than 260 µm also occur.
Identities in the literature are perhaps not certain. E.g. Zheng & Zhuang 2017 do not mention the number of spore cells and fragments, but the spore photo suggests flavovirens indeed.



