Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

29-08-2025 05:16

Teleomorph of Dendrostilbella smaragdina ?
Francois Guay Francois Guay

I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros

29-08-2025 19:04

Yellow apothecia on cow dung without hairs - Cheilymenia spec.?
Thomas Flammer

Spores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

28-08-2025 17:24

Literatur request J. Berthier, Typhula
Thomas Flammer

I know, that this is not the real topic of this fo

24-08-2025 21:59

Podospora
Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonsoir amis mycologues,Trouvé sur crottin de che

27-08-2025 12:02

On Abies alba macroscopically similar to Propolis sp.
Pavol Palo

Hello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing

25-08-2025 17:37

Petit asco indéterminé
François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét

24-08-2025 21:30

Orbilia dryadum ?
Ethan Crenson

Found yesterday in a New Jersey park.  An Orbilia

21-08-2025 18:09

Semble Thecotheus
Edmond POINTE Edmond POINTE

Bonjour Amis mycologues.Trouvé sur crottin de che

22-08-2025 18:10

Protocrea ?
Ethan Crenson

Hello everyone,  I found what I think might be P

20-08-2025 19:04

Adelphella babingtonii - lacking much brown pigment
Ethan Crenson

Hello, This asco was found on the same wood as my

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 18:49
Enrique RubioDear friends:
Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
My collection on Alnus glutinosa bark
  • message #9987
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:27
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Spores longer than D. favacea
  • message #9988
Enrique Rubio, 06-01-2010 19:28
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Asci polysporous
  • message #9989
Jacques Fournier, 06-01-2010 20:32
Jacques Fournier
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio, 07-01-2010 17:09
Enrique Rubio
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique