06-03-2025 23:27
Edvin Johannesen
Hello!I have a collection of Asterosporium asteros
06-03-2025 21:53
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I found a very abundant Phaeosphaeria on t
04-03-2025 15:38
Hardware Tony
Found on I what I think is Phyllostachys aurea, mo
06-03-2025 11:45
Wim de GrootSeveral smal patches of Hypoxylon ticinense (sl?)
06-03-2025 17:23
Vasileios Kaounas
Found 13/2/25 on moss, very far away, only almond
30-06-2018 14:36
Jan KnuimanGrowing on a rotten twig of a broadleaf tree (Sali
03-03-2025 08:10
Juuso ÄikäsI recently found these quite small fruitbodies gro
05-03-2025 08:53
Thomas LæssøeWith hyper fusiform-pointy spores.https://svampe.d
03-03-2025 08:20
Bernard CLESSE
Une idée sur ces petites boules blanches sur mou
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 18:49
Dear friends:Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:27
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
My collection on Alnus glutinosa bark
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:27
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Spores longer than D. favacea
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:28
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Asci polysporous
Jacques Fournier,
06-01-2010 20:32
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio,
07-01-2010 17:09
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique