02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),
02-07-2025 17:26
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo
02-07-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for
30-06-2025 16:56
Lydia KoelmansPlease can anyone tell me the species name of the
01-07-2025 23:37
Josep Torres
Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and
30-06-2025 12:09
Edvin Johannesen
This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found
30-06-2025 06:57
Ethan CrensonHi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro
30-06-2025 14:45
Götz Palfner
This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood
25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co
Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 18:49
Dear friends:Is Diatrypella tocciaeana on Alnus bark a good species actually? I can see that the Index Fungorum sinonimize it with D. favacea, but I believe to see very differences with it.
Mny thanks¡
Enrique
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:27
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
My collection on Alnus glutinosa bark
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:27
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Spores longer than D. favacea
Enrique Rubio,
06-01-2010 19:28
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Asci polysporous
Jacques Fournier,
06-01-2010 20:32
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Enrique;
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
I agree it is troublesome but since Croxall revised the genus (1950) the situation did not evolve. Based on microscopic and cultural data he synonymized several taxa with D. favacea, regardless of differences in the morphology of stromata he considered related to the texture of host bark.
This should be reevaluated with modern tools but Diatrypaceae is not trendy!
But if you gather enough data supporting the splitting of D. favacea, things may change!
Best wishes,
Jacques
Enrique Rubio,
07-01-2010 17:09
Re:Diatrypella tocciaeana
Many thanks for your advices, Jacques.
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique
The time will say some thing to us...
Enrique