Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

26-03-2026 15:31

Ãke Widgren Åke Widgren

Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r

26-03-2026 12:50

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,I'm having a hard time figuring which Pseudombr

26-03-2026 11:17

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found 11-03-26, in leaf of Ulmus sp. Diameter 2-4

25-03-2026 22:23

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

25-03-2026 20:53

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

25-03-2026 15:06

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me confirm

25-03-2026 13:54

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Does anyone know where I could download Paoletti's

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Rutstroemia maritima?
William Slosse, 11-02-2026 22:15
William SlosseToday, February 11, 2026, we found the following Rutstroemia in the drifting dunes at Bredene (Belgian coast).
The habitat and substrate (dead leaves of Ammophila arenaria) suggest Rutstroemia maritima.
° Crystals present in the texture
° Croziers present
° Ascus tips euamyloid (in Melzer, my Lugol unfortunately appears to be degenerated...).
A sporee is currently being prepared to measure spores in water.
Can this observation be confirmed, or do further preparations need to be made/examined?
Thanks in advance,
William
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
  • message #84521
Hans-Otto Baral, 11-02-2026 22:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
The rather thin apical dome looks typical to me. Please do the spore photo in water to see living spores.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 17:17
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
And here are the spores from a sporee and measured in water:

(13.6) 14.1 - 17.8 (18.4) × (5.8) 6 - 7.5 (7.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.3 - 2.58 (2.6) ; N = 20
Me = 15.6 × 6.5 µm ; Qe = 2.4

Additional questions:
1. According to Index Fungorum, the current name is Clarireedia maritima. Is this nomenclature preferable?
2. Should this species be listed as Clarireedia cf maritima, or is it clearly described and recognized as such?

Thanks in advance,
William

  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
  • message #84532
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-02-2026 17:52
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
This is a full match. The genus is a matter of taste. From DNA Clarireedia is a well-defined group, but from morphology I see hardly any chance to separate it from the core of Rutstroemia.

In my folders I use Clarireedia. There you can see the high similarity among the collections on Ammophila.
William Slosse, 12-02-2026 18:52
William Slosse
Re : Rutstroemia maritima?
Thx, Zotto!