Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

13-02-2026 03:30

Tomaz Vucko Tomaz Vucko

Hello! I found these immersed perithecia on a stic

13-02-2026 18:05

Margot en Geert Vullings

On February 9, 2026, we found these small hairy di

13-02-2026 18:02

Nogueira Héctor

November 2025 León (SPAIN) ID Help Hello! Thi

12-02-2026 21:34

patrice Callard

Bonjour, la face inférieure des feuilles ce certa

11-02-2026 22:15

William Slosse William Slosse

Today, February 11, 2026, we found the following R

12-02-2026 14:55

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10581810

11-02-2026 19:28

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

on small deciduous twig on the ground in forest wi

25-04-2025 17:24

Stefan Blaser

Hi everybody, This collection was collected by JÃ

09-02-2026 22:01

ruiz Jose

Hola, me paso esta colección en madera de pino, t

10-02-2026 17:42

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous me donner

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Pithya cupressina with large apothecia looking like P. vulgaris.
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 04-01-2026 17:45
Stephen Martin MifsudI was happy to find these orange asmocyetes which at first glance I identified tentavely as Pithya vulgaris based on the size of the apothecium that ranged between 3.5 to 5.5cm and the substrate being a woody twig. P. cupressina, which I am familiar with, are here found of fallen leaves of Cupressus sempervirens and are up to 3mm wide (mostly barely 2mm).

Can I assign this finding to P. vulgaris or I still need further verifications (microscopical investigations).

  • message #84266
  • message #84266
  • message #84266
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 08:22
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)
Reading this article to help my determination..... not easy as it is in German. Will report back my conclusion. I am posting the link of the paper for other members who might find it useful.

https://www.zobodat.at/pdf/Mycologia-Bavarica_10_0055-0062.pdf
Stephen Martin Mifsud, 05-01-2026 09:28
Stephen Martin Mifsud
Re : Pithya vulgaris (or P. cupressina can still be considered)

After reading the paper, these are the most important features to distinguish P. cupressina and P. vulgaris (considered distinct species).


Spore Size (at maturity)
Pithya cupressina: (9) 10-12 (12.5) um
Pithya vulgaris 12-15 um

Substrate Specialization 
Pithya cupressina: Cupressaceae (e.g., Chamaecyparis, Cupressus, Juniperus, Sequoia, Thuja)
Pithya vulgaris: Pinaceae (usually Abies species, occasionally Picea, Pinus)

Size of Apothecia
Pithya cupressina: 2-5 mm wide
Pithya vulgaris: (5-) 10-15 mm wide

My finding was on an unkown twig up to 5.5mm wide and spores with the following measurments:  


9.1 [10.1 ; 10.6] 11.6 × 8.9 [9.9 ; 10.4] 11.3 µm
Q = 1 [1.0] 1.1 ; N = 27 ; C = 95%
Me = 10.4 × 10.1 µm ; Qe = 1



So it is (disappointingly) the usual Pithya cupressina which grew slightly larger up to 5mm possibly because they were growing on a woody twig, while on leaves and leaf petioles  fruiting bodies only reach  1-3mm in diameter (here in Malta). 

Eye-catching are the operculate asci !!! 

  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268
  • message #84268