Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

28-05-2026 16:15

James Mitchell

Hello,Does anyone have the original publication of

28-05-2026 11:06

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750

23-05-2026 11:44

Charles Grapinet Charles Grapinet

Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro

25-05-2026 16:44

François Bartholomeeusen

Hi forum members,During an excursion organised by

26-05-2026 21:25

Dirk Gerstner

Hello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li

26-05-2026 22:44

Ethan Crenson

Hi all, I think I have Incrucipulum capitatum her

22-05-2026 14:44

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi

25-05-2026 16:35

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,

22-05-2026 13:29

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

23-05-2026 18:57

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousRécolté sur une branchette de Sal

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Micropodia pteridina?
Tony Moverley, 27-04-2026 18:48
Collected 23rd April 2026, Norfolk, England
Swarms of white apothecia (0.1-0.2mm diameter) on surface of blackened Pteridium aquilinum (Bracken) stems, just below ground level.
Apothecia with short stalks
Superficial on the substrate surface (ie nor emerging from within the stem).
All white - no differentiation in colour between the internal hymenial disc, rim or external (ectal) surface.
No marginal hairs evident
Ascospores (5.7-) 6.4 (-9.3) x (1.0-) 1.5 (-1.8) n=10 with guttules at each end.
In the UK, collections like this appear to be recorded as Micropodia pteridina, supported by the entry in Ellis & Ellis Microfungus on Land Plants (2nd Ed. 1997).
However, Zotto Baral (Micropodia pteridina, a misinterpreted fern-inhabiting discomycete with unclear relationship within the Helotiales, Baral H.-O., 2023, ascomycete.org 15 (1): 1-8) points out there are several confusion species:
Psilachnum sp. (chrysostigma agg.)
Fuscolachnum pteridis (sessile and with marginal hairs so ruled out in this case?)
Mycroscypha arenula (but only on leaves, not stems?)
Mollisia sp.
According to Zotto's paper, these species can be differentiated with regard to exicipular structure, presence/absence of marginal hairs and apothecial stipe and apothecial development.
I have the opportinity to ITS barcode but with no publicly available reference sequences for M. pteridina, is there any benefit?
Tony Moverley
Norfolk Fungus Study Group
  • message #85181
  • message #85181
  • message #85181
  • message #85181
Hans-Otto Baral, 27-04-2026 20:13
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
Hi Tom

it is a good idea to obtain a sequence. The true M. pteridina is sessile and erumpent. This one has a short stipe. I am quite sure this is the sibling of Psilachnum chrysostigma, differing in the ascus base (without croziers). Do you think you can verify this? Only from the spores there is no real differences. I recommend to mount in Congo Red by strong pressure to separate the elements.

Zotto
Tony Moverley, 27-04-2026 21:23
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
Hi Zotto,
Thanks for the help.. I did try without success to find some asci bases to check for croziers, having seen you mention that Mariko Parslow examined 2 collections in the Kew fungarium labelled 'Micropodia pteridina' which turned out to be Psilachnum sp. (lack of croziers). I'll try looking again.
All the best Tony
Tony Moverley, 29-04-2026 20:21
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
So I've tried again to look for the bases of any asci but without any real success. I think I might have found some but my confidence in proving a negative (ie that the base are simple sepate as opposed to having croziers) is low. 
In the absence of the asci base feature, is there anything definitive I can say about this collection? ie that is definitely NOT M. pteridina because I have short-stalked apothecia . . .
Hans-Otto Baral, 29-04-2026 20:38
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
I think the question is only if it is P. chryststigma or P. basi-pteridii. The former I never saw on blackened substrate, so I would exclude it. The croziers is virtually the only difference between the two.
Tony Moverley, 30-04-2026 08:58
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
Hi Zotto, Thanks for that. Forgive my confusion here.
Do you have a description or protologue for Psilachnum basi-pteridis Baral nom. prov.? All I can find is on the CEMAS website:
https://www.centrodeestudiosmicologicosasturianos.org/?p=28526 
This shows a picture and description of Nylander's Micropodia pteridina (attached) on blackened stems with 'brievement pediculee' (short stalk/foot) and what appears to be simple sepatate asci bases. So is this actually a Psilachnum sp.?

  • message #85214
Hans-Otto Baral, 30-04-2026 09:18
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
P basi-pteridis is undescribed, one reason is that no sequence exists.

About M. pteridina I recommend you to read my article in Ascomycete.org, 15 (1) : 1–8.

Boudier did not care about croziers, he never illustrated one as far as I know. Since M. pteridina was insufficiently described, he made this misidentification.
Tony Moverley, 30-04-2026 09:26
Re : Micropodia pteridina?
Thanks Zotto. I have read your article in Ascomycete.org, 15 (1) : 1–8 several times and I'm still trying to understand exactly what is going on!
All the best Tony