Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

18-04-2025 23:16

Robin Pétermann Robin Pétermann

Bonjour, Voici une probable Mollisia, genre que j

19-04-2025 20:48

Per Marstad Per Marstad

Dear Ascofrance. I have not posted pyrenos for a l

19-04-2025 18:58

Michel Hairaud Michel Hairaud

Bonjour,Je recherche l'article suivant :  ... K

19-04-2025 08:51

Henri Koskinen

Could you help me in the right direction with this

18-04-2025 21:54

Hartmut Schubert Hartmut Schubert

Hi Forum,I found this aquatic pyrenomycete a few d

16-04-2025 08:53

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.An anamorph photographed under holm oaks thi

18-04-2025 17:13

Francois Guay Francois Guay

I found this interesting reddish Helotiales growin

18-04-2025 11:34

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España), r

17-04-2025 23:03

Yanick BOULANGER

BonsoirVoici un Scutellinia qui nous pose un probl

17-04-2025 18:31

Giovanni ANTOLA Giovanni ANTOLA

Bonjour, J'aurais besoin d'aide avec ce pezizale

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Lambertella tubulosa
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 14:54
Can someone tell me more about this mushroom please?
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = LSU ok, 99.65% Lambertella
tubulosa MH872970, Tricladium splendens OR243764, and others
Can ITS analysis be interpreted differently?

Bojan
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
  • message #80567
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 19:49
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Hello

it is great to have a sequence similarity for LSU, but ITS would be definitely more valiable because it is more frequently used.

Besides, it would be much helpful if you could provide micros in water from the fresh fungus.

What I can see is that croziers are present. But not even spore size is available. This could be an interesting case, but it could also be the common Hymenoscyphus imberbis, which is a complex I suspect.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:06
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thanks Hans-Oto for the quick reply. I also found measurements of spores, unfortunately there are not enough measurements, maybe it will be enough. Even the first ITS research: 
2024-3052-ALV48470 3-16/9/2024 * = ITS ok, 99.83% undetermined
Helotiales MZ650953, 98% Zalerion, Helicodendron, Halenospora and
others, LSU?
  • message #80569
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 21:28
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
In the water
  • message #80570
Hans-Otto Baral, 01-11-2024 22:07
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
The paraphysis is dead but remnants of the refractive vacuoles (VBs) are visible.
Actually I see a 100% match between MZ650953 and
KC411993 Hymenoscyphus imberbis strain HB 6797 from Tübingen.
This was a typical representative f that species collected by me. So your specimen is also H. imberbis.
An unpublished LSU of H. imberbis (HB 7894 from Mongolia, without ITS) is 99.8% to L. tubulosa (e.g. CBS 125202), Centrospora clavata, Tricladium obesum and Spirosphaera floriformis. But in ITS blast of my H. imberbis I get only Tricladium obesum with 97.5% and Lambertella tubulosa with 97%. So these are obviously not conspecific and LSU is not useful for species delimitation.
Rot Bojan, 01-11-2024 22:16
Re : Lambertella tubulosa
Thank you for the comprehensive and supported answer
Greetings from Slovenia
Bojan