![](/images/nonlu.png)
16-07-2024 18:32
![Andgelo Mombert](/uploads/user_vgn/Mombert-0001.jpg)
Bonsoir, Un discomycète sur Liochlaena lanceolat
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-01-2022 16:36
Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
![](/images/nonlu.png)
24-08-2020 13:00
![Yulia Lytvynenko](/uploads/user_vgn/Lytvynenko-0001.jpg)
Dear friends.Looking for a copy of the following w
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-07-2024 14:29
![Viktorie Halasu](/uploads/user_vgn/Halasu-0001.jpg)
Hello, a thin-fleshed Mollisia on a monocot stem
![](/images/nonlu.png)
14-07-2024 18:23
Joaquin MartinHi,I found this Ascomycete on horse dung.The spora
![](/images/nonlu.png)
13-07-2024 19:50
![Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)](/uploads/user_vgn/Egertova-0001.jpg)
Hello,I have identified this fungus as Hamatocanth
![](/images/nonlu.png)
08-07-2024 23:34
Villalonga PacoSmall Scutellinia growing in garden soil (calcareo
![](/images/nonlu.png)
12-07-2024 02:12
Stefan JakobssonOn a wet lake shore I found a single minute apothe
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-07-2024 10:57
![Viktorie Halasu](/uploads/user_vgn/Halasu-0001.jpg)
Hello, I have here a Mollisia on a leaf (possibly
Ciboria sp.
Vasileios Kaounas,
10-03-2024 19:53
but it wasn't on a needle. It was on a rotten leaf, from a plant, which I suspect belongs to one of the three, Urtica, Sonchus oleraceus or Asphodelus.
It's immature, so I didn't count spores. I was surprised that the ascs have such a pronounced curve.
Hans-Otto Baral,
10-03-2024 21:02
![Hans-Otto Baral](/uploads/user_vgn/Baral-0001.jpg)
Re : Ciboria sp.
Ciboria has a textura globulosa. There is a "Ciboria" asphodeli of which I have a folder in Clarireedia (Rutstroemiaceae). The margin tends to be dentate, however, and the spores multiguttulate when alive. You gave no size for the spores?
Vasileios Kaounas,
11-03-2024 11:49
Re : Ciboria sp.
Otto not observed in the small and immature specimen who examined, textura globulosa. Unfortunately I can't confirm the plant. I will try to search again in the same place. The spores were few and all I can say is that these are the minimum and maximum values for what I saw 12.1 [15.1 ; 18.2] 21.2 × 5.3 [6.6 ; 7.9] 9.3 µm
Q = 2 [2.2 ; 2.4] 2.6 ; N = 9 ; C = 95%
Me = 16.7 × 7.3 µm ; Qe = 2.3
Q = 2 [2.2 ; 2.4] 2.6 ; N = 9 ; C = 95%
Me = 16.7 × 7.3 µm ; Qe = 2.3