05-03-2026 10:07
Hulda Caroline HolteHello, I found and collected this species growing
14-03-2026 13:51
Thierry Blondelle
Hi everybody Under Quercus ilex, i hesitate to na
12-03-2026 19:44
Hi to everybody.Can you give me any suggestions ab
11-03-2026 17:36
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Je cherche des indices pour cette réc
12-03-2026 15:45
Åge OterhalsDear forum,I found this small discomycete on a ver
08-03-2026 14:05
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour à tous,Sur 3 récoltes supposées de H. l
11-03-2026 16:48
Bruno Coué
Bonjour, je serais heureux d'avoir votre avis sur
Found on horse dung.Ascomata: Sphaerical; 366 um in diameter with a short neck 65 um wide & 34 um high.
Asci: 8-spored; 53-8-54.2 (-59.8)x21.6-24.8 (-28.4) um
Spores: biseriate; (13.4-)17.4-20.4x(13.2-)14.2-15.7x10.5-12.3 um; at first when immature sphaerical, becoming ellipsoidal and finally citriform with apiculate germ pores.
In contrast with the publication of Garcia the measurement of the ascomata is more than indicated and there was no report about the presence of a short neck (photo-8), not the best example but measurements are correct.
Photo-2 shows a spore release through the neck of the ascomata.
Reference:
Dania García, Alberto M. Stchigel, and Josep Guarro (2004) Two new species of Sphaerodes from Spanish soils; Studies in mycology 50: 65-66
X.W. Wang, F.Y. Bai, K. Bensch, M. Meijer, B.D. Sun, Y.F. Han, P.W. Crous, R.A. Samson, F.Y. Yang, and J. Houbraken (2019) Phylogenetic re-evaluation of Thielavia with the introduction of a new family Podosporaceae. Studies in mycology 93: fig. 9.
Yasmina Marin-Felix, Josep Guarro, José F. Cano-Lira, Dania García, Andrew N. Miller, Alberto M. Stchigel (2018) Melanospora (Sordariomycetes, Ascomycota) and its relatives Mycokeys 44: 114 & 109
Joop
Thanks for the reply I overlooked the fact of the ostiole and besides that the size of the ascomata is too big.
I have been looking for possibilities with ascomata having ostioles and a bigger size plus citriform spores and for that I ended up with Mi. marchicum.
According to Lindau (1886) and Saccardo (1899) the size of the ascomata and spores for Mi. marchicum are smaller, so no similarity.
It still may be a Microthecium species in my opinion but question is if it makes a diffecrence that the appearance of these species is mainly on soil and my finding was on dung.
Joop









