30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
28-05-2026 16:15
James MitchellHello,Does anyone have the original publication of
28-05-2026 11:06
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10596750
23-05-2026 11:44
Charles Grapinet
Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro
25-05-2026 16:44
François BartholomeeusenHi forum members,During an excursion organised by
26-05-2026 21:25
Dirk GerstnerHello everyone, I'm completely stumped by this li
26-05-2026 22:44
Ethan CrensonHi all, I think I have Incrucipulum capitatum her
Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Thorben Hülsewig,
22-08-2021 20:54
yesterday I found im botanical garden Bochum this asco on Equisetum hyemale.
My guess was a Psilachnum, but now I am not so sure.
The marginal hairs are curved (like claws) and partly glued.
There are 2 types of spores (the short and the long spores).
Both spore types are formed in the ascus, unfortunately I don't know if all asci are 8-spored.
Any idea what this could be ?
best regards,
Thorben
Thorben Hülsewig,
24-08-2021 18:04
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
No ideas ?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-08-2021 23:12
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Psilachnum inquilinum is a species that grows on Equisetum and has hairs thar are apically bent. Where I live it seems to be fairly common. Maybe this could be that? Zotto has earlier mentioned that there is a species with bigger spores that grows on E. hyemale. The two-sized spores are maybe a bit weird? Are they from different apos?
Thorben Hülsewig,
26-08-2021 17:17
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Hi Juuso,
i think your idea with Psilachnum inquilinium is not bad.
The two-sized spores are in all Apos present. That's why think it belongs to the fungus.
I see also only the Psilachnum apos on these substrate and some Hydropisphaera, but no other.
I saved it as Psilachnum cf. inquilinum and wait until i can collect more material.
Maybe the other material doesn't have 2 types of spores.
best regards,
Thorben
i think your idea with Psilachnum inquilinium is not bad.
The two-sized spores are in all Apos present. That's why think it belongs to the fungus.
I see also only the Psilachnum apos on these substrate and some Hydropisphaera, but no other.
I saved it as Psilachnum cf. inquilinum and wait until i can collect more material.
Maybe the other material doesn't have 2 types of spores.
best regards,
Thorben