![](/images/nonlu.png)
24-07-2024 13:19
Thomas FlammerI am looking for a PDF of the above article. Thank
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:13
![Thierry Blondelle](/uploads/user_vgn/-0211.jpg)
Bonjour,Récolte sur branchette de Castanea dans u
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 10:28
![Alan Rockefeller](/uploads/user_vgn/-0063.jpg)
Which Peziza did I find on horse dung in Humboldt
![](/images/nonlu.png)
19-07-2024 11:08
![Miguel Ãngel Ribes](/uploads/user_vgn/Ribes-0001.jpg)
Good morningThis Scutellinia from July 9 grew at 1
![](/images/nonlu.png)
21-07-2024 06:23
Masanori KutsunaDear all, Does anyone have these papers and send
![](/images/nonlu.png)
08-07-2024 23:34
Villalonga PacoSmall Scutellinia growing in garden soil (calcareo
Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Thorben Hülsewig,
22-08-2021 20:54
yesterday I found im botanical garden Bochum this asco on Equisetum hyemale.
My guess was a Psilachnum, but now I am not so sure.
The marginal hairs are curved (like claws) and partly glued.
There are 2 types of spores (the short and the long spores).
Both spore types are formed in the ascus, unfortunately I don't know if all asci are 8-spored.
Any idea what this could be ?
best regards,
Thorben
Thorben Hülsewig,
24-08-2021 18:04
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
No ideas ?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-08-2021 23:12
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Psilachnum inquilinum is a species that grows on Equisetum and has hairs thar are apically bent. Where I live it seems to be fairly common. Maybe this could be that? Zotto has earlier mentioned that there is a species with bigger spores that grows on E. hyemale. The two-sized spores are maybe a bit weird? Are they from different apos?
Thorben Hülsewig,
26-08-2021 17:17
Re : Psilachnum ? on Equisetum hyemale
Hi Juuso,
i think your idea with Psilachnum inquilinium is not bad.
The two-sized spores are in all Apos present. That's why think it belongs to the fungus.
I see also only the Psilachnum apos on these substrate and some Hydropisphaera, but no other.
I saved it as Psilachnum cf. inquilinum and wait until i can collect more material.
Maybe the other material doesn't have 2 types of spores.
best regards,
Thorben
i think your idea with Psilachnum inquilinium is not bad.
The two-sized spores are in all Apos present. That's why think it belongs to the fungus.
I see also only the Psilachnum apos on these substrate and some Hydropisphaera, but no other.
I saved it as Psilachnum cf. inquilinum and wait until i can collect more material.
Maybe the other material doesn't have 2 types of spores.
best regards,
Thorben