16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
15-02-2026 04:32
Tomaz Vucko
One more specimen that is giving me some descent a
17-02-2026 13:41
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir
16-02-2026 18:34
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su
16-02-2026 17:14
Joanne TaylorLast week we published the following paper where w
16-02-2026 16:53
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un
Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 17:54
Using Huhtinen's 1989 key this is the best fit I got but would appreciate a second opinion.
The apos are up to 0.4mm wide. Asci arising from croziers, ascus pores amyloid.
Spore measurements: 7.7-9.4 × 2.5-2.9 µm (N = 5).
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 20:21
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
A second opinion could be H. fuckelii var. fuckelii. By memory I know albohylalina with larger spores with larger guttules.
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 20:31
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Yeah, the spores cast a doubt. They didn't have much oil and are a bit small but would fit in the range. And there weren't many of them (maybe a bit unripe?). Fuckelii max. width was about 2.5 microns and would have a low oil content if I remeber correctly. Maybe I'll try to find more spores and this would be clearer.
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 21:20
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
my memory is not fully sure if Huhtinen uses living in his key or dead spores which are smaller.