18-01-2026 12:24
Josep Torres
Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin
25-01-2026 23:23
Tomaz Vucko
Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc
23-01-2026 21:50
Cameron DKI am looking for this please publication. is anyon
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
21-01-2026 16:32
Gernot FriebesHi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich
21-01-2026 16:48
Gernot FriebesHi,after my last unknown hyphomycete on this subst
20-01-2026 17:49
Hardware Tony
I offer this collection as a possibility only as e
15-01-2026 15:55
Lothar Krieglsteiner
this one is especially interesting for me because
Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 17:54
Using Huhtinen's 1989 key this is the best fit I got but would appreciate a second opinion.
The apos are up to 0.4mm wide. Asci arising from croziers, ascus pores amyloid.
Spore measurements: 7.7-9.4 × 2.5-2.9 µm (N = 5).
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 20:21
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
A second opinion could be H. fuckelii var. fuckelii. By memory I know albohylalina with larger spores with larger guttules.
Juuso Äikäs,
24-05-2020 20:31
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
Yeah, the spores cast a doubt. They didn't have much oil and are a bit small but would fit in the range. And there weren't many of them (maybe a bit unripe?). Fuckelii max. width was about 2.5 microns and would have a low oil content if I remeber correctly. Maybe I'll try to find more spores and this would be clearer.
Hans-Otto Baral,
24-05-2020 21:20
Re : Hyaloscypha albohyalina var. albohyalina?
my memory is not fully sure if Huhtinen uses living in his key or dead spores which are smaller.