13-08-2025 22:41
Francois Guay
I found this species on decaying wood in Québec,
13-08-2025 12:17
Castillo Joseba
De ayer en la misma muestra que el Ascobulus anter
13-08-2025 12:01
Castillo Joseba
De ayer en KK de vacunoAscas con 20 o mas esporasa
12-08-2025 19:44
Enrique Rubio
Could someone send me a pdf copy of this article?S
11-08-2025 20:31
Jorge HernanzNous avons trouvé cette espèce dans des habitats
06-08-2025 08:56
Antonio Ezquerro Antoñana
Hola a todos, Me gustaría saber qué opinan sobre
28-07-2011 23:41
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsCourtesy of Zotto, I post to the forum
10-08-2025 11:40
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Hello, would you agree here with the identificati
09-08-2025 17:52
Henri KoskinenHello, would you say this is Peziza or Pachyella?
Geoglossum sp.
Vasileios Kaounas,
30-12-2019 09:12
Found in forest with Pinus halepensis, near to Olea.
asci (186.9) 192.9 - 220.1 (235) × (16.6) 19.4 - 21.2 (23.6) µm
spores (103.3) 110.7 - 135.7 (136.2) × (11.6) 12.9 - 13.4 (13.7) µm
5775-0001.pdf
Jacky Launoy,
30-12-2019 09:43
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Try Geoglossum fallax. If not look if the ascus is amyloid or hemiamyloid
Luc Lenaerts,
30-12-2019 14:47
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
I think it's Geoglossum cookeanum, because of the 7-septate spores and the presence of much moniliform chaines in the parafyses. Difference with Geoglossum barlae sensu stricto with rotated, distorted and intertwined paraphyses and almost without clear moniliform chains in the paraphyses is sometimes difficult. In my opinion the spores here are not 110-135 µm long, but much smaller.
Kind regards
Luc Lenaerts
Sabino Arauzo,
30-12-2019 15:17
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Yes, Geoglossum cookeanum, the spore measures must be wrong.
Sabino.
Peter Püwert,
30-12-2019 15:25
Re : Geoglossum sp.
Hi,
I agree with Luc and Sabino.
Greetings Peter.
