24-04-2024 21:54
éric ROMEROBonjour, J'ai trouvé ce Lasiobolus sur laissées
23-04-2024 15:18
Lothar Krieglsteiner... but likely a basidiomycete. I hope it is o.k.
23-04-2024 13:17
Edouard EvangelistiBonjour à tous, Je viens de récolter ce que je
23-04-2024 21:49
Ethan CrensonHello all, A friend recently found this orange as
22-04-2024 11:52
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)Hello,I made a loan of a collection of Microstoma
11-01-2022 16:36
Jason KarakehianHi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
22-04-2024 20:38
Miguel Ángel RibesGood afternoon.Does anyone know this anamorph?It g
19-04-2024 14:28
B ShelbourneCudoniella tenuispora: Distinctive macro and habit
J'ai deux autres collections de Scutellinia, mais elles n'ont pas sporulé. J'imagine que l'observation et la mesure des ascospores ne seront pas aussi précises que si obtenues par sporulation. Mais en étudiant l'hyménium, est-il possible d'arriver à une certaine précision ? Est-ce un exercice trop hasardeux ?
Merci de vos commentaires de formation...
Meilleures salutations,
Hello everyone,
I have two other collections of Scutellinia, but they have not spore print. I imagine that the observation and measurement of ascospores will not be as accurate as if obtained by sporulation. But when studying the hymenium, is it possible to reach a certain precision? Is it a risky exercise?
Thank you for your training comments ...
Best regards,
Claude
With many ascos as the spores develop in the asci they grow until mature so taking measurements of immature spores will give you inaccurate figures. The added problem with Scutellinia is that some of the spores shrink in size as the outer layer of the spore coalesces to become the ornamentation(up to 6µ shorter according to Schumacher). With some species if the spores have almost matured they will take up the stain even whilst still in the asci and using that information and the details of the hairs you can come to a reasonable conclusion. Another proviso given by Schumacher is that imature spores can show more or less ornamentation than ejected spores.
So you can give identification a go with your immature specimens but the chances of success are lower.
Mal
you can check, if there's any leaf, piece of wood etc. over the hymenium of some apothecia - the sporeprint might be on the lower side of it. I saw this once with S. cejpii, one apothecium was dried with a fragment of a leaf on it - after removing it, it was white from the lower side with lots of nice mature spores.
Also, if the spores in asci near the margin are not completely mature, you might try to take a small sample from the centre of the hymenium. Often there's higher percentage of mature spores there than near the margin. I got this advice from another mycologist, who's working a lot with Scutellinia and I can confirm that it worked for me too. But I used it only with a few collections, because taking a sample even with thin and sharp injection needle makes further damage around the puncture and about a quarter of the spores in the sample were crushed. Maybe would I have cut the whole apothecium in half and then made a thin section from the middle, it would be less damaging, but I didn't try that yet.
With my own collections I always try to get sporeprint on aluminium foil (a piece of dark paper would be perhaps better?), which I later pack together with the exsiccate.
Kind regards,
Viktorie
I take good note of everything you just explained to me and I will try, knowing that my chances are rather slim.
Best
Claude
The idea of looking around the collection on a debris is very interesting and I will look carefully. For my part, I cut the Scutellinia in four, then make a thin cut from the middle to the margin; Finally, I will see my future collections. For spore print, I usually put on a transparent plastic sheet protector, which I then cover. Eight times out of ten, I get a nice spore; which is essential for measurements and observation of ornaments.
Best regards,
Claude