12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
11-01-2026 20:35
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
12-01-2026 05:24
Danny Newman
Cyathicula coronata on Urtica dioicaCataloochee Di
15-12-2025 11:49
Danny Newman
ITS sequences from the following two collections B
09-01-2026 17:41
Arnold BüschlenHallo, F. dilatata wird von vielen Bryoparasiten
10-01-2026 20:00
Tom SchrierHi all,We found picnidia on Protoparmeliopsis mur
07-01-2026 22:22
Danny Newman
Tatraea sp. on indet. hardwood The Swag, Great Sm
10-01-2026 01:18
Danny Newman
cf. Neovaginatispora fuckelii on indet. shrub Pre
07-01-2026 10:24
Danny Newman
Pezicula sp. on indet. hardwood Appalachian Highl
09-01-2026 10:08
Blasco Rafael
Hola, en el mismo habitat que la anteriorRetamaDia
Sarcoscypha coccinea
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 16:53
Mal
Hans-Otto Baral,
16-03-2017 17:38
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Yes, it is obviously S. coccinea. Was it this one that became rare in England?
Malcolm Greaves,
16-03-2017 17:56
Re : Sarcoscypha coccinea
Zotto Thanks.
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal
Yes it was the only one in the Phillips book read by the majority of amature mycologists in the 1980/90s and so almost all finds in that era were designated as S coccinea. On the national records database they have a ratio of 340 : 1360 with almost all the S austriaca post 1980 and a lot of the S coccinea probably wrongly assigned.
Mal

