Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

26-03-2026 15:31

Ãke Widgren Åke Widgren

Hello,I found this one in October last year, on r

27-03-2026 10:47

Åge Oterhals

I have tentatively identified this Stictis to S. f

25-03-2026 10:35

Hulda Caroline Holte

Hello,I collected this species growing on a dead b

24-03-2026 21:37

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur bois (tronc) très pourri de conifère

26-03-2026 12:50

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,I'm having a hard time figuring which Pseudombr

26-03-2026 11:17

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found 11-03-26, in leaf of Ulmus sp. Diameter 2-4

25-03-2026 22:23

Marc Detollenaere Marc Detollenaere

Dear Forum,On a debarked stem of Tilia, we found s

24-03-2026 15:44

Åge Oterhals

I hope someone can confirm the name of this collec

25-03-2026 20:53

François Bartholomeeusen

Dear forum members,On 23 March 2026, I found sever

23-03-2026 20:16

Miguel Ãngel Ribes Miguel Ángel Ribes

Good eveningI'm unable to identify this Coprotus o

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Chlorencoelia torta or not?
François Bartholomeeusen, 14-07-2016 22:32
Good evening forum members,

The fruiting bodies were found on a fallen branch, probably willow, lying in the mud in a willow swamp. The fruiting bodies break through the bark, diameter of 3 to 8 mm. color of olive yellow to brown. I was convinced that it is Chlorencoelia versiformis but the dimensions of the spores and asci are much smaller than indicated in the description of J.R. Dixon in Mycataxon. It would then be Chlorencoelia torta but I get almost no blue reaction in Melzer. Can someone put me on the right track?
Thank you very much!

spores: 7,23-9,21 x 1,89-2,99 µm
asci: 39,97-53,15 x 4,83-6,38 µm

François Bartholomeeusen 

  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
  • message #43860
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-07-2016 22:57
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Chlorencoelia is in fact similar, but I think this could instead be Encoelia glaberrima. Did you try to better see the paraphyses? Living paraphyses of Chlorencoelia contain conspicuous yellowish vacuolar bodies, while E. glaberrima not.
François Bartholomeeusen, 14-07-2016 23:30
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Dear Zotto,

it was hard to make a "coupe" and to distinguish the paraphyses, here are some photos.
Between the asci I saw yellow gel-like substances. What I took for a parafyse is branched.
Thank you in advance to looking at the photos.

Greetings,

François
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
  • message #43864
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-07-2016 08:59
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
There is some problem with the sharpness of your photos, but the last one is good enough to see that the apical cell is without yellowish VBs but instead covered by yellow exudate. Both this contradicts a Chlorencoelia, in my experience.

So possibly Encoelia glaberrima.
Zotto
François Bartholomeeusen, 15-07-2016 18:08
Re : Chlorencoelia torta or not?
Thank you very much Zotto. The last pictures are taken with a magnification of 1000 and then one can see the limitations of my microscope.

Friendly greetings from Flanders,

François