Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

18-03-2026 13:09

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches

17-03-2026 19:41

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

18-03-2026 17:22

Katarina Pastircakova

Hi there,I'm looking for the following literature:

19-03-2026 10:56

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Ciliolarina tipo????
Blasco Rafael, 26-01-2016 12:18
Blasco RafaelHola , esta muestra esta recogida sobre piñas de Cupressus, 
diametro 0,30--0,40 x altura 0,15--0,18.
Pelos acabados en punta, septados , lisos , 50--55 x 3--3,5 
Ascas 36--48 x 6--7.
esporas 5--7 x 2--2,5
Un saludo
Rfaael
  • message #40434
  • message #40434
  • message #40434
  • message #40434
  • message #40434
  • message #40434
Stip Helleman, 27-01-2016 07:33
Stip Helleman
Re : Ciliolarina tipo????
Hola Raphael,
I think this finding is more like Hamatocanthoscypha laricionis with more straight hairs or a Hyaloscypha, you need to know croziers and IKI reaction.

regards,
Stip
Blasco Rafael, 27-01-2016 08:34
Blasco Rafael
Re : Ciliolarina tipo????
Hola Stip
Crozier + vistos solo en Ascas en formacion (inmaduras) 
Melzer + poco vistoso
Parece que encaja bien con su propuesta
Rafael
Stip Helleman, 28-01-2016 08:06
Stip Helleman
Re : Ciliolarina tipo????
Hola Rafael,
it is normal that croziers are best visible at immature asci. Yes I think also H. laricionis is right.

Regards,
Stip