Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

25-02-2023 18:36

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir, Trouvé sur un tronc de Salix recouvert

12-07-2025 16:45

Thierry Blondelle Thierry Blondelle

Bonjour à tous,J'avais d'abord pensé à des stro

05-07-2025 12:38

Åge Oterhals

I found this pyrenomycetous fungi in pine forest o

01-06-2025 09:37

Charles Aron Charles Aron

Hi All, I found this Octospora growing with liver

06-07-2025 19:36

Castillo Joseba Castillo Joseba

me mandan el material de Galicia (España) recolec

07-07-2025 19:22

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi,Does anyone know what could this anamorph be?ht

02-07-2025 18:45

Elisabeth Stöckli

Bonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),

04-07-2025 20:12

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A fungus growing on the surface of a trunk o

20-06-2025 08:33

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.Small, blackish, mucronated surface grains s

28-06-2025 16:00

Josep Torres Josep Torres

Hello.A tiny fungus shaped like globose black grai

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Nick Aplin, 25-04-2014 02:39

Salut à tous,


I am trying (and mostly failing!) to identify some ascomycetes in a floodplain in the South of England - I wonder if anyone can help me with this species on a dead Phalaris culm?


Collected 24/04/2014


Perithecia: Mostly immersed (some almost erumpant), 0.5 - 0.6mm diam. All ostioles rounded


Asci: Bitunicate, 8-spored


Ascospores: 5-Septate, brown and distinctly roughened on release, 26.8 - 30.6 x 6.1 - 7.2 µm. No sheath observed in indian ink


Pseudoparaphyses: around 2 µm diam, mostly unbranched, septate, without conspicuous droplets


There was an anamorph nearby which reminded me of Stagonospora (?)


I've tried looking in 'the usual' genera that I associate with grasses in this habitat (Massarina, Phaeosphaeria, Lophiotrema, Massariosphaeria etc.) but with little luck yet - Can anyone make any suggestions or at least point me in the right direction?


Amitiés,


Nick

  • message #28910
  • message #28910
  • message #28910
Björn Wergen, 25-04-2014 05:47
Björn Wergen
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Hi Nick,

my first thought was that the species belongs in the group of Phaeosphaeria luctuosa, which has a Stagonospora anamorph. This anamorph should have longer conidia as shwon on your third picture. The spores of Ph. luctuosa are furthermore described as being smooth (Leuchtmann 1984).

I do not know your species, but I have collected and studied many of these small dots on grasses and herbs. I do not wish to disturb you with sending another species :D

regards,
björn
Nick Aplin, 28-04-2014 01:25
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm

Hi Björn,


Thanks, I also thought of Phaeosphaeria at first, but was thrown off course by the spores which seemed quite lophiostomoid when immature (sorry for the poor photo).


I went back over Shoemaker & Babcock and didn't find anything that fit, though Montagnula subsuperficialis seemed very close. The authors mentioned a similar species which seems a good solution for my problem: Montagnula rhodophaea.


What do you think?


I noted that Leuchtman only described microconidia as an anamorph for this species, so perhaps my Stagonospora belongs to another fungus......


I have almost exhausted the specimen, so I would probably be wasting your time by sending this one - If I collect it again I'll post it.


Best wishes,


Nick

  • message #28952
Björn Wergen, 28-04-2014 05:56
Björn Wergen
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm
Hi Nick,

I think you are right, finely dotted spores are typical for Montagnula species, but also for some Leptosphaeria and Phaeosphaeria, so we have to look for hyphal structures on the surface, something like a "Stroma" or a Clypeus. A section through the pseudothecia would also help.

regards,
björn
Nick Aplin, 29-04-2014 01:05
Re : Dothideomycete on Phalaris culm

Hi Björn,


There are indeed patches of dark stromatic tissue around the pseudothecia, and surface of the host (under the epidermis) is black with fungal cells. It seem there is also a golden-red discolouration of the substrate which I think Leuchtmann describes (my German isn't very good and Google Translate doesn't help much sometimes!).


The pseudothecium wall seems OK too - I think I will label this one as M.rhodophaea unless anyone disagrees....


Best wishes,


Nick


 


 


 


 

  • message #28974
  • message #28974