11-04-2026 15:45
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová)
Please, could anyone send me this paper?Moyne G.,
11-04-2026 13:34
Artem PtukhaHello, I am seeking assistance with the identific
11-04-2026 10:19
Michel Hairaud
Chers amis d'Ascofrance , voici une très bonne no
11-04-2026 10:10
Michel Hairaud
Dear Ascofrance members, here is some very good ne
10-04-2026 23:22
Gernot FriebesHi,ascospores are 1- to 3-septate, approximately
10-04-2026 15:51
William Slosse
Hello everyone, On 08/04/26, I found a growth sit
09-04-2026 15:25
Jac GelderblomOn bare soil between mosses Ifound an asco I deter
09-04-2026 13:55
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10589176
09-04-2026 10:12
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10587061
Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 00:42
Hi againI think this is more interesting.
On a spider, 2,5-3 mm tall, light pink synemmata.
Conidiospores:
(3.48) 3.87 - 4.52 (4.98) x (1.65) 1.89 - 2.20 (2.41) µm
Q = (1.61) 1.86 - 2.30 (2.58) ; N = 46
Me = 4.18 x 2.03 µm ; Qe = 2.07
Thanks in advance
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 07:35
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Miguel.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
I think your collection matches Gibellula pulchra. The conidiophores of G. leiopus are very short and the conidia are a little bit more longer (4-5 µm).
I'm going to send to you a paper of A. Kubátová about G. leiopus.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 09:17
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Hi Nicolas
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
It looks like G. pulchra, more than G. leiopus, but I am not capable to distinguish both species . I have found more papers and pictures about G. pulchra in the internet, wich requires a more careful reading.
But, what is the picture nº 5, which was present mainly in the stem, while conidiophores (pictures 6-9) where present mainly in the cap?
Thanks about the paper.
Miguel Á. Ribes
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
13-02-2014 15:08
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Conidiophores can be present on the stem, this is what is shown on the 5th picture.
Miguel Ángel Ribes,
13-02-2014 22:12
Re : Gibellula arachnophila f pleiopus?
Ooops, I thought conidiophores were pictures 6-9 ( like in G. pulchra), and picture 5 are ¿? another type of conidiophores, more similar to G. pleiopus ones.