15-09-2025 14:40
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco
14-09-2025 22:16
Philippe PELLICIERApothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de
13-09-2025 14:01
Thomas Flammerdark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate
10-09-2025 17:18
Blasco Rafael
Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec
13-09-2025 14:10
Wim de GrootWe found this hymenoscyphus on rubus fruticulosis.
11-09-2025 16:57
Jason Karakehian
Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is
10-09-2025 23:53
Marcel Heyligen
Found on Robinia pseudoacasia together with Diapor
02-09-2025 11:34
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10527903
Melanomma subdispersum
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 07:58
Bonjour, Quelqu'un parmi vous connait-il bien Melanomma subdispersum ?
Does somebody well know Melanomma subdispersum ?
Ce champignon est donné usuellement sur Betula, mais a déjà été observé aussi sur Sorbus.
Les spores que je vous montre sont celles d'une récolte personnelle sur Sorbus aria. Elles mesurent 22-26 x 8-10 µm. Reconnaissez-vous Melanomma subdispersum ?
Alain
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 21:44
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
I need the macroscopical appearance to say something :)
The spores does not look like those from M. subdispersum, but from Hysterium pulicare.
You should also compare with my finding on Funghiparadise (M. subdispersum and H. pulicare).
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
07-03-2013 21:55
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Bjorn,
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed) . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain
It isn't Hysterium pulicare (that I have seen many dozen of times, indeed) . It's a Melanomma species, ascomata are subglobulose.
It's very probably M. subdispersum but I just would like the opinion of a body who has already worked it. The ascospores are perhaps slightly different, I don't know (and substrate is not Betula).
Thanks,
Alain
Björn Wergen,
07-03-2013 23:43
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Alain,
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
compared with my finding on Betula, with only slightly 2-coloured spores, I do not think that your collection is M. subdispersum.
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
08-03-2013 08:00
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Hi Björn,
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
It was my opinion. I suppose that your ascospores are more constricted, especially at primary septum ?
It could be another species. But which one ?
Alain
Yannick Mourgues,
15-03-2013 20:21
Re : Melanomma subdispersum
Salut Alain.
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick
Comment est la structure de la paroi ?
Yannick