04-11-2025 09:07
Josep Torres
Hello.A suspected Hymenoscyphus sprouting on a thi
04-11-2025 12:43
Edvin Johannesen
Hi! One more found on old Populus tremula log in O
03-11-2025 21:34
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.4-0.5 mm diam.), whitish, short-stip
28-10-2025 15:37
Carl FarmerI'd be grateful for any suggestions for this strik
03-11-2025 16:30
Hans-Otto Baral
Hello I want to ask you if you have found this ye
28-10-2025 19:33
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre avis sur cette r
31-10-2025 09:19
Lothar Krieglsteiner
Can somebody provide me with a file of:Rogerson CT
Diaporthe on Salix branch
Björn Wergen,
04-04-2012 14:26
Chère collegues,I have found this small Diaporthe species on dead attached Salix twix with single growing perithecia, embedded in the bark and with 0,1-0,3 mm diam. Microscopically I think it should be a member of the genus Diaporthe, but I am not sure what it is exactly (D. rudis for example has similar spore size and shape, but grows on other substrates).
It has also similarities with D. alnea, described in Breitenbach&Kränzlin, Vol 1, which seems to have Alnus on the top of its priority list.
Perhaps you have an idea ;)
I have probably seen very inconspicuous appendixes on both endings.
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
04-04-2012 17:49
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
I think it could be Diaporthe eres, as thought by Wehmeyer (I call it for myself "eres complex").
Alain
Alain
Björn Wergen,
04-04-2012 21:21
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Thanks Alain for your opinion. I also thought about eres, but this finding was completely another one than I had on Ulmus last year.
regards,
björn
regards,
björn
Alain GARDIENNET,
05-04-2012 07:52
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Perhaps another idea. You haven't given several informations about macroscopy and I ask me if it could be other genus. Have you looked in Plagiostoma (Meijia, SIM68, 2011) ?
But I always think it could D. eres.
Alain
But I always think it could D. eres.
Alain
Björn Wergen,
05-04-2012 09:18
Re : Diaporthe on Salix branch
Yes I did, but except P. salicellum with different spore size and P. exstocollum with different substrate there is no species which fits well to my finding. I think D. eres should be right, I have compared it with my finding from 2011 and spores are nearly the same, but macroscopic appearance is so variable.
thanks again Alain
regards,
björn
thanks again Alain
regards,
björn