07-12-2015 14:17
Zugna Marino
Buon giorno a tutti, ad un primo momento, non ess
29-01-2026 10:04
Jean-Paul Priou
Bonjour à tous, Marcel LECOMTE président de L'A
21-01-2026 16:32
Gernot FriebesHi,I need your help with some black dots on a lich
26-01-2026 11:49
Margot en Geert VullingsWe found this possible anamorph on a dead Cytisus
25-01-2026 23:23
Tomaz Vucko
Hello! I found this species that resembles Delitsc
18-01-2026 12:24
Josep Torres
Hello.An anamorph located on the surface of a thin
Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
Luc Bailly,
22-03-2012 00:37
Bonjour à tous,Récolté chez moi, en bord de route ombragé, sur feuilles mortes de Carex divulsa subsp.leersii. Roche-à-Frêne, Manhay, prov. Luxembourg, Belgique, 29.02.12.
Pycnides éparpillées, immergées, noirâtres à la loupe, à peine érompantes (ostiole), lisses, 350-400 µ de diamètre.
Péridium text. ang., mince, brun clair mais noirâtre autour de l'ostiole.
Conidies brun clair, non guttulées, lisses, non septées, (4.8)5-6.5 x (1.5)1.8-2 µ
J'ai fouiné dans la doc que j'avais: pas d'idée.
Amitiés - LUC.
Chris Yeates,
22-03-2012 02:09
Re : Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
This will not be much help Luc, but I have made many 'coelomycete' collections on Carex (and also on Poaceae) which do not correspond to any descriptions I can find
W.B. Grove's "British Stem and Leaf Fungi" can sometimes help with a name, but how many true species are involved seems far from clear
best wishes
Chris
W.B. Grove's "British Stem and Leaf Fungi" can sometimes help with a name, but how many true species are involved seems far from clear
best wishes
Chris
Luc Bailly,
22-03-2012 12:30
Re : Coelomycète s/ Carex divulsa subsp.leersii
Hi Chris,
Yes, it seems there's still much, much work to be done for those fungi. Especially the ones with microconidia.
After checking Ellis, I've checked in Grove (I got it from Cyberliber). And when one has no idea, Saccardo, it takes way too much time!
And yes, there's the problem of: how many are true species, but also, how many are yet poorly described/studied, if at all. Stutton (1980) was very careful himself...
Cheers - LUC.
Yes, it seems there's still much, much work to be done for those fungi. Especially the ones with microconidia.
After checking Ellis, I've checked in Grove (I got it from Cyberliber). And when one has no idea, Saccardo, it takes way too much time!
And yes, there's the problem of: how many are true species, but also, how many are yet poorly described/studied, if at all. Stutton (1980) was very careful himself...
Cheers - LUC.