
29-08-2025 05:16

I think I may have found the teleomorph of Dendros

29-08-2025 19:04
Thomas FlammerSpores 21.2 - 26.2 x 8.3 - 11.3 µm - Q: 2.20 - 2.

28-08-2025 17:24
Thomas FlammerI know, that this is not the real topic of this fo

27-08-2025 12:02
Pavol PaloHello dear friendsI would like to ask for sharing

25-08-2025 17:37

Bonjour,Nous avons trouvé samedi dernier à l'ét

20-08-2025 19:04
Ethan CrensonHello, This asco was found on the same wood as my
Tree section
Yannick Mourgues,
09-01-2010 20:35

Who could identify the tree with this section ? Is-it possible ?
I think it could be Salix.
Do you agree ?
Yannick
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 20:37

Re:Tree section
Bonsoir,
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 20:54

Re:Tree section
Bonsoir Yannick
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:25

Re:Tree section
Yes Stip, this site is wonderful. Under "Species list" you find lots of European genera and species.
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:28

Re:Tree section
Hello,
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 21:40

Re:Tree section
Yes, in my memory Fraxinus was more diffuse pored
Stip
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:42
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:45

Re:Tree section
Hello Zotto,
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas