25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
25-11-2025 11:03
Mick PeerdemanHi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so
24-11-2025 15:23
Arnold BüschlenHallo, auf einer offenen Kiesfläche am Rande ein
23-11-2025 11:16
Bohan JiaHi, I found small discs growing on dead stem of
21-11-2025 10:56
Christopher Engelhardt
Very small (~0,5 mm) white ascos, found yesterday
Tree section
Yannick Mourgues,
09-01-2010 20:35
Hi.Who could identify the tree with this section ? Is-it possible ?
I think it could be Salix.
Do you agree ?
Yannick
10016.jpg
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 20:37
Re:Tree section
Bonsoir,
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
je voudrais dire Fraxinus.
amicalement,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 20:54
Re:Tree section
Bonsoir Yannick
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Fraxinus is very good possible, but you can perheps check for your own at tis website:
http://www.woodanatomy.ch/welcome.html
Amitiés
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:25
Re:Tree section
Yes Stip, this site is wonderful. Under "Species list" you find lots of European genera and species.
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
But for me Fraxinus is excluded, see under Fraxinus excelsior.
Salix is well possible, but a closer photo would be helpful
Zotto
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:28
Re:Tree section
Hello,
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
isn't that what I believed to be called "ring-pored"?
best regards,
Andreas
Stip Helleman,
09-01-2010 21:40
Re:Tree section
Yes, in my memory Fraxinus was more diffuse pored
Stip
Stip
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2010 21:42
Re:Tree section
Here you can compare. Salix may show a slightly more dense aggregation of the pores in the spring region but never has the big pores of Fraxinus and Quercus.
Andreas Gminder,
09-01-2010 21:45
Re:Tree section
Hello Zotto,
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas
yes, you are right, the pores are too diffusely scattered to be called truly ring-pored. I was misled be the seemingly big diameter of the pores, but may be that it due to that we don't know the scale of the foto.
best regards,
Andreas