19-10-2025 18:58
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Il y a un peu plus de de
19-10-2025 14:10
Camille MertensBonjour à tous.Asco stipité 1mm de texture appar
17-10-2025 18:45
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Oct. 2025.
23-09-2025 13:31
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623
15-10-2025 16:39
Edvin Johannesen
These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci
03-10-2025 13:44
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus
13-10-2025 19:05
Louis DENYBonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,
11-10-2025 20:27
Marcel Heyligen
Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro
Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 16:42
.. collected 8.6.20, Germany, Bavaria, Neuburg a.d. Donau, "Kreut", on Mentha longifolia. I think almost everything fits with T. sulphurea (that grows (only?) on Urtica), including the hemiamyloid pore, with the exception of the small spores - I measured them 23-33/+-3 µm.
Is this too small or can it still be accepted for sulphurea?
Best regards, Lothar
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:18
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
Hi Lothar
in my foles this is the perfect spores size of sulphurea = nylanderi: I have in my folder name 18-39 x 2,5-3,5(-4).
The asci are withou croziers?
I had the spacies once on Impatiens gland. and Francois valade on Phytolacca.
Zotto
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
09-01-2021 17:28
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
thank you, Zotto!
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
I have looked in an older key of yours, where the measures are larger.
I must more look in your folders, in future ...
So everything is o.k.
Best regards, Lothar
P.S. I fear I did not look for the croziers ...
Hans-Otto Baral,
09-01-2021 17:31
Re : Trichopeziza cf. sulphurea - but with (too?) small spores
I can't find larger measurements, only the width may go to *3-3.8(-4).
But you are right, my old key says 33-38/2,5-3,5 µm, so neglects shorter spores.