Bonjour.

Oui, Enrique, que je salue, a raison.

Tu pourras lire la description de Calosporella innesii dans Mycological research 112 (2008) cette note :

Notes — Calosporella innesii is characterised by hyaline,
mostly 3-septate ascospores with small apical appendages
and has been transferred to Prosthecium by Wehmeyer (1941)
based on its phragmospores with apical appendages. This
generic classification has subsequently been commonly followed.
Barr (1978) argued that the correct epithet for the taxon
should be Prosthecium platanoidis due to priority, but the type
collection of this species is apparently not congeneric with the
current fungus (see notes above). The name to be applied for
the species is therefore C. innesii.
In the original description, Currey (1858) did not provide any
details about collections. There are numerous authentic collections
of the Currey herbarium in K, one of which is here
selected as lectotype. To ensure nomenclatural stability, a
recent well-developed specimen for which a culture is available
is here selected as epitype. The appendages can be seen well
in water mounts even from old herbarium specimens, but they
quickly disappear in KOH mounts.

Un grand merci à vous. J'ai bien fait de vous soumettre ce champignon ''à priori'' facile à reconnaître.

Je viens de lire l'article en question.

Merci encore !

Andgelo

Bonjour Alain,

Merci, mais quid de l'article cité ci-dessus ?

Andgelo