
29-03-2025 05:45
Sebastien BassoHello, I'm conducting a mycological inventory in

19-04-2025 20:48
Dear Ascofrance. I have not posted pyrenos for a l

19-04-2025 08:51
Henri KoskinenCould you help me in the right direction with this

18-04-2025 21:54

Hi Forum,I found this aquatic pyrenomycete a few d

16-04-2025 08:53
Hello.An anamorph photographed under holm oaks thi

18-04-2025 17:13

I found this interesting reddish Helotiales growin

18-04-2025 11:34
Me mandan el material seco de Galicia (España), r
Little "tongues"
Dragiša Savic,
23-04-2014 11:55
Björn Wergen,
23-04-2014 20:11

Re : Little "tongues"
Hi,
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
it should be compared with Hysterographium.
lg björn
Andrew N. Miller,
23-04-2014 21:37

Re : Little "tongues"
Looks like an old Rhytidhysteron to me.
Andy
Andy
Christian Lechat,
23-04-2014 21:43

Re : Little "tongues"
I think it is not a fungus
Chr1stian
Chr1stian
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 08:17
Re : Little "tongues"
Thank you all but I guess I'll have to look for her again.
Alain GARDIENNET,
24-04-2014 13:59
Re : Little "tongues"
Probably a single vertical cut would have give an information. I agree with Andy but we have too much little informations.
What is the substrate ?
Alain
Dragiša Savic,
24-04-2014 14:57
Re : Little "tongues"
The substrate is Fagus sylvatica. They were completely rotten and attached to a tree on one side, so I called them tongues. I've never seen Rhytidhysteron and Hysterographium on photos look same but it is much smaller, I found him (http://www.naturefg.com/pages/b-fungi/hysterographium% 20flexuosum.htm)