Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

22-05-2026 21:35

Steve Clements

Bonjour, I expected this find on old wood on our

22-05-2026 18:12

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... in moist chamber from Portugal.As the fungus s

22-05-2026 20:08

Ethan Crenson

Hello all,  Yesterday in NYC I was visiting an e

11-01-2022 16:36

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (

20-05-2026 17:47

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Mollisia on dead Juncus stems mown l

22-05-2026 14:47

Gernot Friebes

Hi,superficial ascomata collected on bark of a liv

22-05-2026 14:44

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi

22-05-2026 13:29

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

22-05-2026 10:59

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Trouvé sur Phragmites, ce que je pense être un L

20-05-2026 21:49

Margot en Geert Vullings

We found this Lachnum on Juncus stems mown last ye

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hyaloscypha britannica?
Francois Guay, 13-08-2025 22:41
Francois GuayI found this species on decaying wood in Québec, Canada. I think it might be Hyaloscypha britannica. Would you agree with my identification?
-Apothecia are 0,2 to 0,5 mm

-Spores: 7–10.2 × 2.3–2.8 µm

-Asci 8 spored and IKI+


Here’s the iNat link with photos: https://www.inaturalist.ca/observations/301618959

Thanks for your help!

François
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:18
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Hi Francois

the group is correct but I would prefer H. aureliella because of spore size. Both species were recently segregated in the genus Eupezizella.

Zotto
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:23
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
I think H. britannica has a bit wider ascospores, so I think your collection could fit with H. aureliella
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 14-08-2025 17:24
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Zotto was (of course) faster than me :)
Hans-Otto Baral, 14-08-2025 17:27
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
My database says H. britannica 7-12.5 x 2-3.2 and H. aureliella 5.3-10 x 1.8-3.2.

(both from Huhtinen 1990)
Francois Guay, 15-08-2025 12:52
Francois Guay
Re : Hyaloscypha britannica?
Great, so H. aureliella it is! Thanks to both of you, Zotto and Nicolas!