Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

27-11-2025 15:41

Thomas Læssøe

Spores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;

27-11-2025 12:01

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10496727

27-11-2025 11:46

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493918

27-11-2025 11:31

Thomas Læssøe

Collectors notes: Immersed ascomata, erumpent thro

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

25-11-2025 14:24

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522

26-11-2025 18:13

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

The entire run of Mycotaxon is now available throu

21-11-2025 15:22

Vasileios Kaounas Vasileios Kaounas

Found in moss, forest with Pinus halepensis. Dime

24-11-2025 18:17

ruiz Jose

Hola en madera, quizás de alnus. Esporas(12.1) 12

25-11-2025 11:03

Mick Peerdeman

Hi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Hymenoscyphus sp.
Vasileios Kaounas, 03-12-2024 12:47
Vasileios Kaounas
Hymenoscyphus conscriptus ?

In Hedera helix, in forest with Abies cephalonica

stipe 0,2-2,0 cm

ascocarp 0,2-0,4 cm

spores 15.9 [17.1 ; 17.7] 18.9 × 4.6 [5.3 ; 5.6] 6.2 µm
Q = 2.8 [3.1 ; 3.3] 3.7 ; N = 30 ; C = 95%
Me = 17.4 × 5.4 µm ; Qe = 3.2
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-12-2024 15:56
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
H. conscriptus hasn't such high oil content with large LBs. My guess is H. subferrugineus.

2 cm stipe length is much, my data from various collections have max. 9 mm, with apodiam. from 0.8 to 9 mm.
Vasileios Kaounas, 03-12-2024 18:26
Vasileios Kaounas
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
my fault

stipe 2-5 mm

ascocarp 2-4 mm


 


Thanks Otto !!!!

Hans-Otto Baral, 03-12-2024 20:19
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
Hmm, I do not want to be ugly but so small apos I can hardly believe.  The apos look like up to 1 mm.
Vasileios Kaounas, 12-12-2024 16:19
Vasileios Kaounas
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
you are right !!!!
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-12-2024 17:39
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Hymenoscyphus sp.
See,s I misread your first statement as 0.2-0.4 mm :-(