Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-09-2025 19:43

Philippe PELLICIER

Sur branche morte de Mélèze. Les ascospores sphÃ

17-09-2025 16:14

Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies enterrées, fermées au début puis s'

17-09-2025 10:50

Heather Merrylees

Hi there!I am hoping for any advice on the identif

11-09-2025 16:57

Jason Karakehian Jason Karakehian

Our revision of Marthamycetales (Leotiomycetes) is

16-09-2025 12:53

Philippe PELLICIER

Pézizes de 1-4 mm, brun grisâtres, sur les capsu

03-09-2025 12:44

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to somebody.I would like to know your opinion o

15-09-2025 14:40

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for a digital copy of the seco

14-09-2025 22:16

Philippe PELLICIER

Apothécies petites jusquà 3 mm, oranges, avec de

13-09-2025 14:01

Thomas Flammer

dark brown apothecia, splitIKI-Spores biguttulate

10-09-2025 17:18

Blasco Rafael Blasco Rafael

Hola, encontre este estiercol de vaca estos apotec

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Francisco Calaça, 07-10-2024 05:02
Francisco CalaçaHi there! A long time I dont figure here! How are you all?

I found this "Podospora" lato sensu on horse dung. It seems have 512 ascospores, according with some colleagues, but i calculated the asci and ascospores volume to obtain obtain an average estimate of how many spores could fit in the ascus, I considered about 80% of the ascus volume being occupied and got a total of approximately 2024 spores. I am not familiar with species that have this total, and those that do, like Podospora praecox and P. serotina, which have around 2048 spores (which is not too far off, considering a margin of error), have spores much smaller than mine. The spores I found are on average 18 x 11 micrometers, and the ascus measures approximately 250 micrometers in length by 120 micrometers in width. My sample closely resembles P. prolifica (around 1024-spored) due to the perithecium characteristics, and P. longicollis (around 512-spored) in terms of spore size. I did not observe appendages on the spores, even on the immature ones. Any suggestions?"

Thank you!


Calaça.

  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
  • message #80323
Michel Delpont, 07-10-2024 10:31
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi Francisco.

Nice to hear from you; I see you always find interesting species. According to Cailleux's work your mushroom could be close to P.praecox, but the absence of appendages on the spores is problematic unless they quickly collapsed, but I doubt it. You show hairs on the perithecium, what are they like? Could you take pictures?


Michel.

Francisco Calaça, 09-10-2024 05:12
Francisco Calaça
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hi, Michel, how are you, my friend! Nice to hear from you too! 
Yep, but I suppose these fungi simple found me in fact :-D
I read about your suggestion, but I not to certain about... Im working on Pseudoechria (https://www.facesoffungi.org/pseudoechria/), once some species resembles my material, specially Pseudoechria longicollis. See the images of perithecial hairs. What do you think? Can you send me this Cailleux's work? Im not certain if I have it...

See you!
Thanks,

Calaça.
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
  • message #80337
Michel Delpont, 09-10-2024 11:51
Michel Delpont
Re : 512 (or more) -spored "Podospora"
Hello Francesco.

Quite a few health issues, but life goes on!
I didn't know about this new genre, interesting! On the other hand, in your photos, the hairs don't seem to form tufts and we can't see the partitions. Were you able to observe the germinative pores?
I'll send you the article directly.
Best regards.
Michel.