23-12-2024 18:18
Rot BojanHello!I've been working with this small fungus for
23-12-2024 22:59
Lucian ClanetHello,I'm trying to find information about the Hyp
21-12-2024 12:45
Marc DetollenaereDear Forum,On naked wood of Fagus, I found some ha
23-12-2024 12:10
Bernard CLESSEBonjour à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
17-12-2024 12:33
Lothar Krieglsteinerthis fluffy anamorph was repeatedly found on decid
22-12-2024 10:19
Simon GurtnerHello,can anyone help me identify this small ascom
22-12-2024 10:53
Bernard CLESSEPourriez-vous me confirmer ma détermination de ce
Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová),
13-07-2024 19:50
I have identified this fungus as Hamatocanthoscypha conincola, although the ascospores are slightly longer than usually - (5.3)5.4-7.1(8.1) × (1.5)1.6-2 µm, Q = (2.8)3.1-4.5 (4.9), n = 25.
Me = 6.3 × 1.7 µm; Qe = 3.6
Asci 25.8-31.1 × 4.4-5.1 µm, IKI bb, H+.
Would you agree with the identification?
I can see that Svr?ek gives "porus not amyloid" for the neotype collection. However, collections presented here or in other reliable webs have amyloid pore. Why it is? Did anyone revise the neotype?
Zuzana
Ingo Wagner,
13-07-2024 20:25
Re : Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Hello Zuzana?
What is the date of the find and what is the substrate?
Greetings
Ingo
What is the date of the find and what is the substrate?
Greetings
Ingo
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová),
13-07-2024 20:31
Re : Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Hi Ingo,
substrate is a cone of Picea abies and it was collected two days ago (11th July 2024).
Zuzana
substrate is a cone of Picea abies and it was collected two days ago (11th July 2024).
Zuzana
Ingo Wagner,
13-07-2024 20:54
Re : Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Hello Zuzana!
I would believe your determination.
Quite typical for this species are the blunt, curved hairs mainly on the flank, less directly on the margin.
The spores that are too long are probably not freshly shot.
Greetings
Ingo
Zuzana Sochorová (Egertová),
14-07-2024 08:30
Re : Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Thank you, Ingo.
Do you understand how is it possible that Svrcek describes inamyloid asci, while today we identity as Psilocistella/Hamatocanthoscypha conincola species with amyloid asci (both on Picea and Pinus cones)?
Zuzana
Do you understand how is it possible that Svrcek describes inamyloid asci, while today we identity as Psilocistella/Hamatocanthoscypha conincola species with amyloid asci (both on Picea and Pinus cones)?
Zuzana
Ingo Wagner,
14-07-2024 13:18
Re : Hamatocanthoscypha conincola
Hello Zuzana!
I can't say, in my opinion it is a mistake.
Greetings
Ingo
I can't say, in my opinion it is a mistake.
Greetings
Ingo