19-03-2026 10:56
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10505643
18-03-2026 13:09
Khomenko Igor
I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches
27-02-2026 11:21
Yannick Mourgues
Hi to all. Here is a specie that can may be relat
18-03-2026 18:42
Gonzalez Garcia MartaI have collected some lyre-shaped apothecia on the
18-03-2026 17:22
Katarina PastircakovaHi there,I'm looking for the following literature:
27-11-2025 15:41
Thomas LæssøeSpores brownish, typically 4-celled; 26.8 x 2.4;
18-03-2026 11:52
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10493688
11-03-2026 17:36
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Je cherche des indices pour cette réc
17-03-2026 10:40
Martine Vandeplanque
Bonjour à tous.Chaque année en mars ou avril, il
17-03-2026 19:41
Bernard CLESSE
Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à
Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
ruiz Jose,
20-02-2024 22:58
puede encajar en macroguttatus?
Nihad Omerovic,
21-02-2024 00:32
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Looks like Rutstroemia, possibly R. henningsiana/paludosa (not sure about croziers).
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 08:03
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Nihad,las estructuras del excipulo no parecen de rutstroemia.
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-02-2024 08:50
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Yes it is rutstroemiaceous from the apical ring shape. Croziers seem to be absent, so R. henningsiana/paludosa would be the choice (now Clarireedia). But the host looks like Equisetum?
Michel Hairaud,
21-02-2024 09:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hi Ruiz,
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:21
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Ok,muchas gracias,por la la aclaración,el excipulo no me pareció de Rutstroemia.saludos
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
No sabría precisar la planta Zotto.
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:31
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Michel,me queda algo del único ejemplar,lo intentaré hacer,pero en estos tamaños tan diminutos me cuesta sacar cortes apropiados.saludos y gracias