17-04-2026 19:16
Enrique Rubio
Hi to everybodyI would appreciate any assistance r
14-04-2026 05:32
Ethan CrensonHi all, A few weeks back a friend pointed out som
17-04-2026 15:14
Bruno Coué
Bonjour.Récoltes du 16/04/2026, sur feuilles mort
12-04-2026 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I'm looking for help with this anamorph collect
14-04-2026 21:52
Gernot FriebesHi,found on dead leaves of Carex elata. Conidia: 4
16-04-2026 22:09
Buckwheat PeteHello, I'd like to ask about this older specimen:
15-04-2026 19:33
Fátima Durán ManzanequeHi!! I need help, I found this Ascomycete but I d
14-04-2026 20:31
Gernot FriebesHi,can this be Psilachnum lateritioalbum on Phragm
12-04-2026 17:56
Hardware Tony
Found on dead stems in February earlier this year
12-04-2026 12:22
William Slosse
In a dune grassland in Oostduinkerke (Belgium), on
Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
ruiz Jose,
20-02-2024 22:58
puede encajar en macroguttatus?
Nihad Omerovic,
21-02-2024 00:32
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Looks like Rutstroemia, possibly R. henningsiana/paludosa (not sure about croziers).
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 08:03
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Nihad,las estructuras del excipulo no parecen de rutstroemia.
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-02-2024 08:50
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Yes it is rutstroemiaceous from the apical ring shape. Croziers seem to be absent, so R. henningsiana/paludosa would be the choice (now Clarireedia). But the host looks like Equisetum?
Michel Hairaud,
21-02-2024 09:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hi Ruiz,
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:21
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Ok,muchas gracias,por la la aclaración,el excipulo no me pareció de Rutstroemia.saludos
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
No sabría precisar la planta Zotto.
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:31
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Michel,me queda algo del único ejemplar,lo intentaré hacer,pero en estos tamaños tan diminutos me cuesta sacar cortes apropiados.saludos y gracias