12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
11-01-2026 20:35
Josep Torres
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
13-01-2026 18:55
Rees CronceStrossmayeria sp. on indet. decroticate hardwoodTh
13-01-2026 07:57
Danny Newman
cf. Bombardia on indet. decorticate woodAppalachia
13-01-2026 10:13
Danny Newman
Cordieritidaceae sp. on indet. wood w/ Hypoxylon s
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
13-01-2026 07:14
Danny Newman
Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S
13-01-2026 09:10
Danny Newman
Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha
13-01-2026 08:43
Danny Newman
Tricladium varicosporioides on indet. decorticate
13-01-2026 08:49
Danny Newman
Coccomyces sp. on fallen Rhododendron leavesPretty
Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
ruiz Jose,
20-02-2024 22:58
puede encajar en macroguttatus?
Nihad Omerovic,
21-02-2024 00:32
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Looks like Rutstroemia, possibly R. henningsiana/paludosa (not sure about croziers).
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 08:03
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Nihad,las estructuras del excipulo no parecen de rutstroemia.
Hans-Otto Baral,
21-02-2024 08:50
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Yes it is rutstroemiaceous from the apical ring shape. Croziers seem to be absent, so R. henningsiana/paludosa would be the choice (now Clarireedia). But the host looks like Equisetum?
Michel Hairaud,
21-02-2024 09:26
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hi Ruiz,
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
The IKI reaction shows a Sclerotiniaceae-type one rather than Heliotiaceae. (Which excludes Hymenoscyphus) The ectal is not Globulosa so Rutstroemiaceae seems more appropriate
May be another preparation with a different angle in the excipulum would show a more Rustroemiacea-like ectal .
My guess is the same as Zotto's, depending on presence or not of croziers, in the genera Clareeridia.
Amitiés
Michel
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:21
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Ok,muchas gracias,por la la aclaración,el excipulo no me pareció de Rutstroemia.saludos
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:22
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
No sabría precisar la planta Zotto.
ruiz Jose,
21-02-2024 10:31
Re : Hymenoscyphus macroguttatus??
Hola Michel,me queda algo del único ejemplar,lo intentaré hacer,pero en estos tamaños tan diminutos me cuesta sacar cortes apropiados.saludos y gracias