Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

20-03-2026 12:53

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, In the field, from distance, my

20-10-2017 09:23

Garcia Susana

Este otro crecía en el mismo trocito de madera qu

20-03-2026 16:16

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These 0.5 mm diam. acervuli were breaking through

19-03-2026 19:34

Filip Fuljer Filip Fuljer

Hello everyone,a few days ago I collected this str

19-03-2026 18:25

William Slosse William Slosse

Good evening everyone, On 18/03/26 I found a few

17-03-2026 10:09

François Freléchoux François Freléchoux

Bonjour, Voici la description rapide d'un petit d

19-03-2026 15:58

Stefan Blaser

Hello everybody, I hope for some hints... Macro:

19-03-2026 17:50

Enrique Rubio Enrique Rubio

Hi to everybodyThese thiny, blackish pseudothecia

18-03-2026 13:09

Khomenko Igor Khomenko Igor

I recently examined Celtis occidentalis branches

17-03-2026 19:41

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Pourriez-vous m'aider à

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Claussenomyces?
Josep Torres, 13-01-2024 17:29
Josep TorresHello.
Some apothecia sprouting massively on a thin trunk of Laurus nobilis.
Spherical in shape, somewhat flattened, orange when wet and greenish brown when dry. with a diameter of between 0.2 to 0.7 mm.
Octosporic asci, with uncinules at their base and amyloid reaction of their apical apparatus.
Moriform ascospores, poorly septate and with free spore measurements of (12.5) 12.6 - 14.3 (15.6) × (4.2) 4.7 - 5.6 (6) µm.

Based on the data obtained, everything seems to fit with what could be considered Claussenomyces prasinulus, but I already studied Clausennomyces prasinulus last year and the reaction of the apical apparatus to iodine was negative, and I can't find anything more similar than Claussenomyces or Vexillomyces.
Any opinion from you will be well received.
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards.

  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
  • message #77913
Hans-Otto Baral, 13-01-2024 17:42
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Claussenomyces?
Amyloidity excludes these. Any paraphyses? Why are all elements dead? The excipulum would be important.

Perhaps a Rodwayella?
Josep Torres, 14-01-2024 14:57
Josep Torres
Re : Claussenomyces?
Thanks Zotto.
The apothecia were not at their best and unfortunately the ascos were dead.
I add a couple of images of the paraphyses, one in water and the other in Lugol, these filiform, septate paraphyses, with intracellular pigment, some branched and that do not protrude above the level of the asci.
Again thank you very much for your help.
Kind regards.
  • message #77921
  • message #77921
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-01-2024 11:32
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Claussenomyces?
Yes, this would fit Rodwayella. R.sessilis would be an option, but the group is difficult.
Josep Torres, 15-01-2024 14:56
Josep Torres
Re : Claussenomyces?
Thanks Zotto, it is best to leave it open like Rodwayella cf. sessilis or as Rodwayella sessilis sl.
It fits very well with the little information I have been able to find on Rodwayella sessilis.
Kind regards.
Hans-Otto Baral, 15-01-2024 16:41
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Claussenomyces?
In my folders it is in Pezizellaceae
Josep Torres, 16-01-2024 17:37
Josep Torres
Re : Claussenomyces?
Thanks Zotto.
The information in your folder is very interesting, including a very detailed description of microscopy.
Kind regards.