Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

17-02-2013 21:11

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Jamoni, P.G. 1998. Un nuovo discomicete coprofilo

11-10-2025 20:27

Marcel Heyligen Marcel Heyligen

Found on a barked branch, 14 mm in diameter, of Ro

11-10-2025 14:20

Jean-Luc Ranger

bonjour à tous, Je ne vois pas comment l'on peut

09-10-2025 22:14

S. Rebecca

We just had the Bavarian Mycology Conference in Au

10-10-2025 00:49

Ethan Crenson

Hello all, This was found last weekend on a hardw

06-10-2025 15:57

David Chapados David Chapados

Hi, Could anyone help me with this Lophiostoma? 

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Eupezizella aureliella ?
Ethan Crenson, 11-07-2023 20:35
Hi all,

I found these white - orange hairy discomycetes in New York City recently.  I thought that they might be Eupezizella aureliella. 

Apothecia are very small, less than 0.5mm wide, in most cases.  They are clothed in bright white hairs. Some of the hairs are tinged bright orange.  In a water mount the orange pigment appears to be an oily or resinous exudate. The hairs are narrow above and wider at the base, textured and approximately 35 x 4µm.

Asci are very faintly amyloid (unless that's just a refractive ring I'm seeing).  Spores hyaline somewhat fusiform, almost cylindrical, 5-5.5 x 2µm. 

On the bark of an unknown tree.

That's all of the data I have right now. Would anyone agree that this is at least close to Eupezizella aureliella?

Thanks,

Ethan
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
  • message #76537
Hans-Otto Baral, 12-07-2023 08:32
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Eupezizella aureliella ?
Spores should get longer but otherwise clearly aureliella. Is there any wood at the bark to check if it is coniferous?
Ethan Crenson, 12-07-2023 13:56
Re : Eupezizella aureliella ?
Thank you so much, Zotto. I only collected bark pieces. They are thick and chunky like Black Locust, which is what thought the wood was originally. But it's remotely possible that it's conifer. When I return to the site I'll look more closely. I'll also check a few more apothecia (there aren't many) to see that the spore measurements are correct.