Hello Dirk, 
in my opinion this is not M. olilvascens which has larger apothecia with more pronounced longer haiirs (it mainly grows on thick Quercus logs). 
Your specimen should belong in the complex around M. fusca, but for typical M. fusca the spores are somewhat too small and too poor of oil. With the key of Andreas Gminder I come to M. "pyrenopezizoides" or to M. "conifericola". A problem: both are provisional taxa not yet published. Perhaps Andreas can say more?
Best regards, Lothar

The cupulate apothecia indeed resemble those of M. olivascens (M. elegantior is KOH- and has larger spores), but my measurements of 5 finds had longer and narrower asci: *(55–)60–85(–89) × (4.7–)5–5.4(–6) ?m {5}. Maybe your apos are a little too immature and would turn flatter, but the margin is strange. I would assume that croziers are present, this should be clarified. M. fusca has prominent, rather thick and thick-walled brown anchoring hyphae, not sure if this is the case here. M. pyrenopezizoides is now M. scopiformis (see our article in Boletus). The margin there does not have such elongate elements and the spores are distinctly cuneiform (basally tapered and acute).

Hello Lothar, hello Hans-Otto,

Thank you very much for your exciting answers.
The apos really don't seem to be properly ripe, as I didn't see any free spores.
The immature asci I measured were all no longer than 50 ym long and about 6-7ym wide.
I saw thick-walled hyphae, but due to lack of experience I did not attach any great importance to them and did not photograph them.
On the macro picture through the stereo loupe I think I see dark subiculum.

The thing with the hooks is not always so easy. :-), but I am attaching a picture.

Greetings Dirk

 

Interesting info!
Who made the new combination Mollisia scopiformis? (I guess the answer should be found in mentioned Boletus paper).

Regards,

Bernard

Hello Zotto,

Eine deutsche Version würde genügen, wenn möglich.

Grüsse,

Bernard

Hello Bernard!

For the german version from Mollisia scopiformis follow this link:
https://asco-sonneberg.de/pages/ueberblick/artikel-i.-wagner.php

Greetings
Ingo W

Vielen Dank, Ingo.

Bernard

Hello all,

One/two apos have survived the post-ripening, or have grown back and also formed spores.
Spores [95% - 22 - QPr - v - H2O(nat) ]
= 11 - 12,8 - 14,5 x 2,3 - 2,8 - 3,4 µm
OCI= 1-2, partly with larger droplets.
Anchor hyphae or subiculum abundant.

I think this could already represent Mollisa_fusca or?

And again many many thanks for your help, the exciting discussions and answers.
Best regards
Dirk