![](/images/nonlu.png)
19-07-2024 11:08
![Miguel Ãngel Ribes](/uploads/user_vgn/Ribes-0001.jpg)
Good morningThis Scutellinia from July 9 grew at 1
![](/images/nonlu.png)
16-07-2024 18:32
![Andgelo Mombert](/uploads/user_vgn/Mombert-0001.jpg)
Bonsoir, Un discomycète sur Liochlaena lanceolat
![](/images/nonlu.png)
17-07-2024 16:29
![Andgelo Mombert](/uploads/user_vgn/Mombert-0001.jpg)
Hello,A colleague found an unknown fungus on the s
![](/images/nonlu.png)
11-01-2022 16:36
Hi does anyone have a digital copy of Raitviir A (
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
1. Large amounts of conidiospores measuring (6)7-8(9) x 2-3 um, cylindrical and slightly curved with rounded ends
2. Numerous snake-like (curved) paraphyses, 2-3 septate, clavate with very rough (densely verrucose) walls
3. Dense and x2 (or more) branched penicillate conidiophores that are much shorter from the paraphyses
4. Structural cells with deep yellow pigment, more or less subsphericall
These fruiting bodies are erupting from the fruit's pulp (not superficial)
Spores' size:
(6.1) 6.8 - 8.5 (9.1) × (2.2) 2.3 - 2.8 (2.9) µm
Q = (2.2) 2.5 - 3.5 (3.9) ; N=27
V = (18) 21 - 33 (38) µm3
Me = 7.7 × 2.5 µm ; Qe = 3 ; Ve = 26 µm3
My first thought is Actinostilbe sp.
Mirek
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
https://grzyby-pk.pl/gat_a/gat_actinostilbe_20200830.php
it is the same one , cant find anything different between the two!!!
But why just Actinostilbe sp. ? There are a lot of spp. ? Anyway you gave me the right track - I take over to do some research on the genus
THANK YOU
Stephen.
"SP" because it is an indescribable species and unfortunately it will probably remain nameless for a long time. Christian examined him and was going to publish, but fate did not allow him :(
Regards
Mirek
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
We keep in touch Mirek !
![Stephen Mifsud](/uploads/user_vgn/Mifsud-0001.jpg)
I managed to get a pure colony and sequence this fungus and the results where Sarcopodium vanillae - 99.39% Sarcopodium vanillae MK685870
Should I assign this finding to this species or maybe it is not convincing (morphology matches ?)
Paper mentioning this collection with details on the anamorph and sexual state
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/338936119_First_sexual_morph_record_of_Sarcopodium_vanillae#fullTextFileContent
I wonder what are your thoughts (overall it matches)