16-02-2026 21:25
Andreas Millinger
Good evening,failed to find an idea for this fungu
08-12-2025 17:37
Lothar Krieglsteiner
20.6.25, on branch of Abies infected and thickened
17-02-2026 17:26
Nicolas Suberbielle
Bonjour à tous, Je recherche cette publication :
15-02-2026 04:32
Tomaz Vucko
One more specimen that is giving me some descent a
17-02-2026 13:41
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, est-ce que quelqu'un pourrait me fournir
16-02-2026 18:34
Thierry Blondelle
Bonjour,La micro de cet anamorphe de Hercospora su
16-02-2026 17:14
Joanne TaylorLast week we published the following paper where w
16-02-2026 16:53
Isabelle CharissouBonjour, quelqu'un pourrait-il me transmettre un
Schizothecium for identification
Suhaib Firdous Yatoo,
04-02-2022 05:50
on horse dungCleistothecia solitary, pyeriform, greyish, transclucent with agglutinate hairs at the tip and rhizoids at the base.
No paraphyses but round to angular cells at the tip of stroma, Asci long cylindrical to broadly clavate 180 – 230 µm × 18 – 30 µm, thin walled, eight spored. Spores ellipsoidal to amygdaliform having appendage at one side and a clearly distinct germpore, hyaline at first, then greenish and later on brownish 26 × 14 µm (33 × 18 µm, max.)
Josep Torres,
05-02-2022 19:35
Re : Schizothecium for identification
Hola Suhaib, tengo un Schizothecium sobre estiércol de vacuno parecido al que nos muestras y las claves del género con unas medidas esporales de 31-33 × 14-16 µm. me llevaron al Schizothecium aloides, pero no puedo afirmar que en tu caso se trate de este ya que los ascos de mi estudio no eran uniseriados.
Saludos cordiales.
Saludos cordiales.
Norbert Heine,
06-02-2022 00:51
Re : Schizothecium for identification
Hola Josep, this is not Schizothecium aloides, because this species has very long hairtufts. It's difficult to give a name for it.
Suhaib Yatoo asked me in private and I wrote the following to him:
"I can't say for sure but I think this is Schizothecium conicum or glutinans.
Spore size 26 x 14 is perfect for Sch. conicum but too small for glutinans, whereas 33 x 18 is too large for conicum but it fits well for glutinans."
Spore size 26 x 14 is perfect for Sch. conicum but too small for glutinans, whereas 33 x 18 is too large for conicum but it fits well for glutinans."
Regards, Norbert
Michel Delpont,
06-02-2022 09:59
Re : Schizothecium for identification
I was also contacted by Suhaib and I replied the same as Norbert.
Michel.
Suhaib Firdous Yatoo,
07-02-2022 04:47
Re : Schizothecium for identification
Thank you so much everyone!