14-12-2024 08:39
Marc DetollenaereDear Forum,On a decorticated branch of Quercus rob
17-12-2024 21:38
Yanick BOULANGERBonsoirPetit boules de poils jaunes sur un pyrenom
17-12-2024 20:05
Lothar Krieglsteinerin the Algarve, Serra Monchique, on old Xylaria ci
17-12-2024 18:50
Lothar Krieglsteinerfrom Portugal, on naked soil under Quercus suber a
17-12-2024 15:15
Lothar Krieglsteiner,, again only 2 apothecia, on twig of Salix. The s
17-12-2024 14:48
Lothar Krieglsteiner.. on leaves of Castanea sativa, only two apotheci
17-12-2024 13:09
Lothar Krieglsteinerfound on old stems of Arundo donax, Algave. The co
17-12-2024 12:33
Lothar Krieglsteinerthis fluffy anamorph was repeatedly found on decid
16-12-2024 20:35
Lothar KrieglsteinerAlgarve, South Coast, near the sea, on sandy soil
15-12-2024 19:44
Bernard CLESSEBonsoir à toutes et tous,Je n'y vois pas clair su
Hello everyone.
I'm not sure if it was a branch of Salix, I also take into account Populus.
Hyaline spores, although ascomata looks mature?
greetings
Mirek
Before publishing this thread I read "A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to world species" and the genre proposed by you seemed very likely due to the construction of spores.
However, she wondering too much spore's length. In combination with a very unusual way of growth (under the bark), I could not decide on it.
Nothing else, however, about more similar features, so I found the name of him as a result; Hysterobrevium cf. smilacis.
Thank you and best regards
Mirek
Hi
I think you are wrong with the Hysteriales. It doesn't look the same macroscopically and microscopically. I don't have time to do research, but I would advise you to abandon this way.
Microscopy reminds me more species like : http://www.ascofrance.com/search_recolte/4803
But you have first to give a complete description of ascomata.
Alain
Thank you for the hint.
I have already seen these mushrooms in this forum, but I could not remind their names.
Only spores fit into Hysterobrevium.
Macroscopic features were completely inappropriate and therefore in the title I wrote "unknown".
Now I know where to look for answers.
Thank you and best regards.
Mirek
Hi Sergey,
I agree with you.
By the way, I never said it was a Dothiora species (but why not ?), but I only wanted to say that microscopy could fit with other fungi.
It will be interesting to further research.
Alain
I specially showed various variants of Ascomata but these crackled were very little. There may be several reasons for this. I suspect, however, that the cause may be excessive dried substrate. A few weeks did not rain in my area and the substrate is strongly dried. I made photos before hydration.
My knowledge in this topic is quite modest but comparing the features, I come to the conclusion that my collection is the most similar to Dothiora Sphaeroides.
Does anyone have a article about this genre?
The information found on the net is quite scarce :(
I do not have a description of this species, so I can not analyze all the features.
greetings
Mirek
Hi Mirek,
Litterature attached.
Alain
Thanks to Alain!
I will have something to do on the evening, now I'm at work.
I quickly reviewed the article and it seems that Ascomata's cracks are not something extraordinary in this kind (page 725).
greetings
Mirek
It was hard, but I advised the translation.
Alain was right :)
I checked the wood structure. I'm not good at this but the wood is more suitable to Populus.
A few days I kept Ascomata in humid maturing until Conidiophores emerged.
I counted the septum spores.
This species fits my in all details :)
Thank you
Mirek