12-11-2019 10:32
Miguel Ángel Ribes
Hi againExactly at the same place than my previous
25-12-2019 17:54
Valencia Lopez Francisco JavierHola a todos/asEstas supuestas pezizas estaban en
28-07-2011 18:31
Alex Akulov
Dear FriendsToday I made the pdf file of Velenovsk
12-07-2015 00:05
Nedim Jukic
This one from the same locality as the previous on
30-05-2026 21:12
Philippe PELLICIERSur branche de mélèze (Larix) près de la neige,
31-05-2026 10:35
Hulda Caroline HolteHello,I collected this species growing on a rather
25-05-2026 16:35
Bernard CLESSE
Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,
29-05-2026 15:35
daniel FERREBonjour à tous,Je voudrais votre aide pour cette
Spore measurements (spore print in water):
(10) 10.5 - 11.9 (14) × 6.2 - 6.9 (8.8) µm
Q = (1.5) 1.6 - 1.78 (1.8) ; N = 20
Me = 11.2 × 6.6 µm ; Qe = 1.7
Tips of paraphyses up to 6 µm wide.
I tried to figure out the species with the aid of the Otidea monograph but didn't come to any certain conclusion. My best guess is O. nannfeldtii and second one O. formicarum.
O. nannfeldtii apparently likes to grow on nutrient-rich, often calcareous soil. This place seemed to be acidic though, not nutritious.
O. formicarum typically grows on old ant hills but apparently can also grow on just needle debris. Maybe the dark warts on the outer surface speak against it? I haven't seen any pics or descriptions that include them for that species.
The last two microphotos are from a dried fruitbody in 3 % KOH.
I think the ectal excipulum (cell walls) became yellow in KOH, did you consider O. tuomikoskii? In some collections, this reaction can disappear again in ca. 20 seconds, in others it stays. Also the intensity and placement of the yellow staining is variable. In nannfeldtii the surface exudates turn reddish brown, and it should have two-layered medulla (although I have a DNA-confirmed collection of nannfeldtii with 1-layered medulla too).
Cheers,
Viktorie
Because of the small size and lack of noticing the yellowing, I didn't consider O. tuomikoskii but with this new info I think you are correct! The ecology would also fit better, this one is apparently much more common and less demanding of habitat that O. nannfeldtii.
Thank you.







