02-07-2025 18:45
Elisabeth StöckliBonsoir,Sur feuilles d'Osmunda regalis (Saulaie),
02-07-2025 17:26
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourRécolté sur une brindille au fond d'un fo
02-07-2025 09:32
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Hello, bonjour.Here is the paper I'm searching for
30-06-2025 16:56
Lydia KoelmansPlease can anyone tell me the species name of the
01-07-2025 23:37
Josep Torres
Hello.A Pleosporal symbiotic organism located and
30-06-2025 12:09
Edvin Johannesen
This tiny, rather "rough" erumpent asco was found
30-06-2025 06:57
Ethan CrensonHi all, Another find by a friend yesterday in Bro
30-06-2025 14:45
Götz Palfner
This is a quite common species on Nothofagus wood
25-06-2025 16:56
Philippe PELLICIERBonjour, pensez-vous que S. ceijpii soit le nom co
Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Perz Piotr,
22-02-2006 00:02
I tink this is correct description: Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
(link: http://wwkk.mikologia.pl/spec/20050821_001A_PERZ/20050821_001A_PERZ.php )
but by B&K is: "paraphyses not observed". Maby this is another Eutypa ?
Another question..... I'am observerd microkonidia among asci and paraphyses - I'am right ??
Best,
Pimpek
Jacques Fournier,
22-02-2006 10:47
Re:Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Hello Pimpek,
you should consult Rappaz' monograph of Diatrypaceae (Mycologia Helvetica 1987, Vol 2, N°3) for a better description of your fungus. It is currently accepted as Diatrype flavovirens (pers.: Fr.) Fr. owing to the well developed entostroma.
Presence or absence of paraphyses is mostly correlated with the state of development and therefore not a diagnostic character.
As to your microconidia, they likely reprsent a contaminant. Conidia of Diatrypaceae are filiform-falcate and are produced in distinct conidiomata.
More soon,
Jacques
you should consult Rappaz' monograph of Diatrypaceae (Mycologia Helvetica 1987, Vol 2, N°3) for a better description of your fungus. It is currently accepted as Diatrype flavovirens (pers.: Fr.) Fr. owing to the well developed entostroma.
Presence or absence of paraphyses is mostly correlated with the state of development and therefore not a diagnostic character.
As to your microconidia, they likely reprsent a contaminant. Conidia of Diatrypaceae are filiform-falcate and are produced in distinct conidiomata.
More soon,
Jacques
NC NC,
22-02-2006 14:22
Re:Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Une question subsidiaire :
"A t-on trouvé en Europe une Diatrype avec un entostroma abondant et jaune moutarde autre que flavovirens ?
Amitiés
Robert
"A t-on trouvé en Europe une Diatrype avec un entostroma abondant et jaune moutarde autre que flavovirens ?
Amitiés
Robert
Perz Piotr,
22-02-2006 14:44
Re:Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Hi Robert,
Do you means, that D.flavovirens is the only one with this pigment? This means - is easyely to describe!
Best,
Pimpek
Do you means, that D.flavovirens is the only one with this pigment? This means - is easyely to describe!
Best,
Pimpek
Perz Piotr,
22-02-2006 14:55
Re:Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Hi Jacques !
I asked about Eutybe, cause by IndexFungorum i found "Diatrype flavovirens (Pers.) Fr., - Current name: Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. 1863"
Now i will searching for Mycologia Helvetica 1987, Vol 2, N°3, thanx. I have only a little informations about Diatrybe (about Pyrenomycetes) ant that, what you are writing about paraphyses is very intresting for me.
When this are nor mikrokonidia - you means they are hyphae of other fungi? And growind into my D.flavovirens? :) Ha, ha - I will never guess :)
Best,
Pimpek
I asked about Eutybe, cause by IndexFungorum i found "Diatrype flavovirens (Pers.) Fr., - Current name: Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. 1863"
Now i will searching for Mycologia Helvetica 1987, Vol 2, N°3, thanx. I have only a little informations about Diatrybe (about Pyrenomycetes) ant that, what you are writing about paraphyses is very intresting for me.
When this are nor mikrokonidia - you means they are hyphae of other fungi? And growind into my D.flavovirens? :) Ha, ha - I will never guess :)
Best,
Pimpek
Jacques Fournier,
22-02-2006 15:55
Re:Eutypa flavovirens (Pers.) Tul. & C. Tul. (1863)
Dear Pimpek,
the generic placement within the Diatrypaceae remains sometimes puzzling since the generic limits are not always clear cut. Never mind! and keep collecting Diatrypaceae until you get acquainted with them.
Try to send a photo of your microconidia wih their dimensions, in case I could have an idea. Otherwise send me a part of the specimen.
Best wishes,
Jacques
the generic placement within the Diatrypaceae remains sometimes puzzling since the generic limits are not always clear cut. Never mind! and keep collecting Diatrypaceae until you get acquainted with them.
Try to send a photo of your microconidia wih their dimensions, in case I could have an idea. Otherwise send me a part of the specimen.
Best wishes,
Jacques