12-01-2026 22:02
Ethan CrensonHello all, I am hoping someone will have some ins
11-01-2026 20:35
Josep Torres
Hello.A very tiny pyrenomycete sprouting sparsely
13-01-2026 18:55
Rees CronceStrossmayeria sp. on indet. decroticate hardwoodTh
13-01-2026 07:57
Danny Newman
cf. Bombardia on indet. decorticate woodAppalachia
13-01-2026 10:13
Danny Newman
Cordieritidaceae sp. on indet. wood w/ Hypoxylon s
13-01-2026 07:28
Danny Newman
Chlorociboria glauca on indet. decorticate logThe
13-01-2026 07:14
Danny Newman
Neodasyscypha cerina on indet decorticate logThe S
13-01-2026 09:10
Danny Newman
Dasyscyphella chrysotexta on indet. decorticate ha
13-01-2026 08:43
Danny Newman
Tricladium varicosporioides on indet. decorticate
13-01-2026 08:49
Danny Newman
Coccomyces sp. on fallen Rhododendron leavesPretty
Hello forum,I have a question about Starbäck's work:
He described Humaria delectans as "J+" (1898), later Saccardo (1902) reprinted it as "ascis [...] jodi ope caerulescentibus" and for this reason, Boudier (1907) placed the taxon into Aleuria Fr. (which is Peziza in contemporary sense). But Svr?ek (1974, combination into Kotlabaea) and Wang et al (2016, comb. into Geopyxis) studied type material and stated that the asci are inamyloid.
I wonder how is it possible, that Starbäck wrote J+ - a typo? Did he mean something else than amyloid asci (it's written on the end of taxon description)? Printer's error? Starbäck's misinterpretation of what he saw? Or another reason?
Thank you in advance for any opinions.
Viktorie
