18-07-2025 23:03
Josep Torres
Hello.Fruitings between 51 and 130 microns in tota
16-07-2025 17:34
Bernard Declercq
Hello,I have trouble distinguishing above mention
14-07-2025 11:20
Michel Hairaud
Bonjour, Voici une espèce de (?) Hyaloscyphace
16-01-2023 21:31
Riet van Oosten
Hello, Nearby the find of Calycina claroflava on
14-07-2025 17:55
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourAutre dossier laissé en suspendJe viens de
14-07-2025 11:17
Yanick BOULANGERBonjourJ'ai un dossier Jackrogersella qui est rest
14-07-2025 15:52
Gernot FriebesHi,I wanted to share this collection on Rubus idae
14-07-2025 13:37
Gernot FriebesHi,do you think this collection could be R. ulmari
possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
Ethan Crenson,
21-08-2017 01:44
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
22-08-2017 07:53
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
The ascospores of P. convexella (= P. constellatio) are usually larger, i.e. 16–19 µm diam.
So probably another species.
So probably another species.
Ethan Crenson,
24-08-2017 06:39
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
Nicolas, thank you for your comments. There seems to be some uncertainty about the spore size for P. convexella/P. constellatio:
Pfister (Synopsis of the Genus): 18-20 (as P. convexella)
FoS: 13-17 (as P. constellatio)
Dennis: 13-15 (as P. constellatio)
Beug: 13-18 (as P. convexella)
Seaver: 15-20 (as Lamprospora constellatio)
In Pfister's Synopsis, P. convexella and P. cinabarrina match in apothecia color, spore features (other than size) etc. P. miltina is not described in full, referring to Rifai (1968) (which I do not have). But I have seen reference to P. miltina elsewhere (Bioimages UK) which seem to align with my collection well:
Apothecia: 3-7mm diam.
Ascospores: spherical, hyaline, smooth,14-16µm diam., with central mass of small oil drops.
Asci: 8-spored, apex not blued in Melzer's Iodine, upto 250µm long, but mostly smaller.
Paraphyses: 2µm diam, slightly wider at the tips, curved at the tips, mostly unbranched, with granular orange contents which turn green in Melzer's Iodine"
Would you say Pulvinula miltina in my case?
Pfister (Synopsis of the Genus): 18-20 (as P. convexella)
FoS: 13-17 (as P. constellatio)
Dennis: 13-15 (as P. constellatio)
Beug: 13-18 (as P. convexella)
Seaver: 15-20 (as Lamprospora constellatio)
In Pfister's Synopsis, P. convexella and P. cinabarrina match in apothecia color, spore features (other than size) etc. P. miltina is not described in full, referring to Rifai (1968) (which I do not have). But I have seen reference to P. miltina elsewhere (Bioimages UK) which seem to align with my collection well:
Apothecia: 3-7mm diam.
Ascospores: spherical, hyaline, smooth,14-16µm diam., with central mass of small oil drops.
Asci: 8-spored, apex not blued in Melzer's Iodine, upto 250µm long, but mostly smaller.
Paraphyses: 2µm diam, slightly wider at the tips, curved at the tips, mostly unbranched, with granular orange contents which turn green in Melzer's Iodine"
Would you say Pulvinula miltina in my case?
Thank you again,
Ethan
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
26-08-2017 16:09
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
I don't think so. P. miltina is an Australian species and maybe an endemic species.
Lothar Krieglsteiner,
26-08-2017 18:24
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
Is there any modern key on Pulvinula, at least for Europe?
Best regards from Lothar
Elsa Sousa,
18-09-2017 01:13
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
Hi Ethan,
I found yesterday what I believe to be the same fungus, here in Portugal. I found it on a stream margin over soil attached to debris and the mesurements are exactly like yours!
I found this document, and I think this could be P. miltina too. Since it has been found on different places over the world, it is possible that it is just rarely collected.
The document - http://www.ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/Pulvinula-johannis-Sydowia-60-0247-0252-0001.pdf
Regards,
Elsa
I found yesterday what I believe to be the same fungus, here in Portugal. I found it on a stream margin over soil attached to debris and the mesurements are exactly like yours!
I found this document, and I think this could be P. miltina too. Since it has been found on different places over the world, it is possible that it is just rarely collected.
The document - http://www.ascofrance.com/uploads/forum_file/Pulvinula-johannis-Sydowia-60-0247-0252-0001.pdf
Regards,
Elsa
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
18-09-2017 18:30
Re : possibly Pulvinula constellatio ? on moss debris
All these collections (of P. miltina) were reported before the use of molecular analyses, so I'm quiet sure that a modern review should provide another diagnostic.
Last weeks, I studied five different collections of Pulvinula (in fresh state) and I was unenable to provide a correct name, based on the known data on this genus :-(
Best.
Nicolas
Last weeks, I studied five different collections of Pulvinula (in fresh state) and I was unenable to provide a correct name, based on the known data on this genus :-(
Best.
Nicolas