Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

23-05-2026 11:44

Charles Grapinet Charles Grapinet

Hello, I am having trouble identifying this copro

25-05-2026 16:44

François Bartholomeeusen

Hi forum members,During an excursion organised by

25-05-2026 16:35

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonjour à toutes et tous,J'ai trouvé récemment,

22-05-2026 13:29

Gernot Friebes

Hi,I am curious to hear your opinion on this mater

23-05-2026 18:57

Sylvie Le Goff

Bonjour à tousRécolté sur une branchette de Sal

23-05-2026 23:53

Moreno Miriam

Bonjour ! Je travaille sur mon mémoire de master

22-05-2026 14:44

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

in unripe condition citrine yellow, then soon fadi

22-05-2026 21:35

Steve Clements

Bonjour, I expected this find on old wood on our

22-05-2026 18:12

Lothar Krieglsteiner Lothar Krieglsteiner

... in moist chamber from Portugal.As the fungus s

22-05-2026 20:08

Ethan Crenson

Hello all,  Yesterday in NYC I was visiting an e

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer, 07-01-2017 22:23
Bonsoir,

je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:

> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)

> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)

> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)

Qui peut m'aider?

Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 00:13
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 10:25
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.

See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."

This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer, 08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Walter Gams, 08-01-2017 16:20
Walter Gams
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.

Best regards  Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN, 08-01-2017 17:41
Nicolas VAN VOOREN
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...