25-11-2025 14:24
Thomas Læssøehttps://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10490522
25-11-2025 11:03
Mick PeerdemanHi all,One of my earliest microscopy attempts, so
24-11-2025 15:23
Arnold BüschlenHallo, auf einer offenen Kiesfläche am Rande ein
23-11-2025 11:16
Bohan JiaHi, I found small discs growing on dead stem of
21-11-2025 10:56
Christopher Engelhardt
Very small (~0,5 mm) white ascos, found yesterday
Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Till Lohmeyer,
07-01-2017 22:23
je cherche la citation correcte des auteur(s) de Tuber rufum:
> Tuber rufum Picco (Index fungorum)
> Tuber rufum Pico ex Fr. (plusieurs auteurs)
> Tuber rufum Pollini (Fries, Systema & Mycobank)
Qui peut m'aider?
Amitiés, Till
Walter Gams,
08-01-2017 00:13
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Picco 1788 is older than Pollini 1816. Sanction by Fries can be indicated as Picco : Fr. (not ex Fr.!), but this may be omitted. Thus Index Fugorum seems right.
Best regards Walter Gams
Best regards Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
08-01-2017 10:25
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
The correct name is Tuber rufum Pico.
See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."
This document is downloadable at: book
See in History of Italian mycology... page 62:
"In 1787 in Turin an interesting work by Vittorio Pico (1750-1823), doctor and naturalist in Turin, entitled "Melethemata inauguralia" appeared that included the topic of Mycology. In this work are several important speciopraphic explanations such as the basics of nomenclature. Pico was also the author of several dissertations in which he addressed issues related to toxicity and edibility of mushrooms."
This document is downloadable at: book
Till Lohmeyer,
08-01-2017 13:29
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Vielen Dank, Walter & Nicolas, für eure Hilfe!
Till
Till
Walter Gams,
08-01-2017 16:20
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
A further study has shown that (1) Fries exclusively sanctioned Pollini´s name with type collected near Verona and (2) that Pollini diid not have any connection to Picco´s publication. Therefore the correct citation will remain T. rufum Poll. : Fr.
Best regards Walter Gams
Best regards Walter Gams
Nicolas VAN VOOREN,
08-01-2017 17:41
Re : Tuber rufum Picco / Pico /Pollini
Yes, that's true. The name sanctioned by Fries (so protected against the previous homonyms) is Tuber rufum Pollini. The name was published in 1816 in his book Libro Horti et provinciæ Veronensis plantae novae vel minus cognitae, Fasc. 1, p. 33.
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...
I think that the tradition used the reference Tuber rufum Pico because Vittadini (1831) cited this name. In the same time, Vittadini considered the two names as synonyms. I don't know if the type material of this two names exists and has been revised...