Accès membres

Mot de passe perdu? S'inscrire

17-10-2025 18:45

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde, Oct. 2025.

25-11-2016 13:54

Stephen Martin Mifsud Stephen Martin Mifsud

Hi, I found numerous seeds of Washingtonia robusta

19-10-2025 18:58

Bernard CLESSE Bernard CLESSE

Bonsoir à toutes et tous,Il y a un peu plus de de

20-10-2025 09:36

Nicolas VAN VOOREN Nicolas VAN VOOREN

Hello.I'm searching for the following article:Bene

19-10-2025 14:10

Camille Mertens

Bonjour à tous.Asco stipité 1mm de texture appar

23-09-2025 13:31

Thomas Læssøe

https://svampe.databasen.org/observations/10534623

15-10-2025 16:39

Edvin Johannesen Edvin Johannesen

These tiny (0.2-0.6 mm), white, pulvinate apotheci

03-10-2025 13:44

Riet van Oosten Riet van Oosten

Hello, Found by Laurens van der Linde on Populus

13-10-2025 19:05

Louis DENY

Bonjour forumSur tronc décortiqué de feuillu x,

17-02-2013 21:11

Peter Welt Peter Welt

Jamoni, P.G. 1998. Un nuovo discomicete coprofilo

« < 1 2 3 4 5 > »
Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 20:56
Miguel Ãngel RibesGood night

This Sarcoscypha, 1-1,5 cm diam., was found in Spain, Andalucía, Córdoba, 421 m, 24-I-2016, in small twigs, probably Viburnun tinus, in a forest with Pinus pinea, Quercus suber, Corylus avellana and Castanea sativa.

Spore size and shape fits me more with S. macaronesica than S. coccinea. Is it possible?

Spore measurement in water, 1000x and live:

(21,4) 24 - 30,8 (33) x (9,4) 10 - 12 (13,6) µm
Q = (2) 2,2 - 2,9 (3,3) ; N = 102
Me = 27 x 10,9 µm ; Qe = 2,5

Thanks a lot.

Miguel Á. Ribes
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
  • message #43627
Hans-Otto Baral, 03-07-2016 21:15
Hans-Otto Baral
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Ah, this is very good! Your question was repeatedly raised, and I cannot answer it. S. macaronesica was now and then believed to occur around the mediterranean see, but evidence was never brought by molecular data. I fear the morphological differences to S. coccinea are too unsharp to clarify this question with the LM.

Your spores are a bit too wide for S. macaronesica according to my key. Apo size would be good indeed. Sequences exist for all these species, so it should work with the molecular method (ITS would be fully sufficient).

Zotto
Miguel Ángel Ribes, 03-07-2016 23:08
Miguel Ãngel Ribes
Re : Sarcoscypha macaronesica not Macaronesian?
Thanks a lot Zotto

I will ask the collector to make molecular analysis.

The best.