15-05-2024 10:54
Viktorie HalasuHello, would anyone have this paper please? I did
14-05-2024 19:48
B Shelbourne• Hymenoscyphus: Habitat, macro, spores, paraphy
10-05-2024 17:40
Anna KlosGood afternoon, Thursday during an inventory we f
14-05-2024 09:19
Hans-Otto BaralHi, I want to announce for next Sunday 17.00 middl
14-05-2024 21:43
Thierry BlondelleBonjour,A côté de Hystérographium fraxini, ces
13-05-2024 12:48
Eduard OsieckAfter eight years (*) I found the same apiosporous
11-05-2024 18:08
B Shelbourne• Mollisia on tree leaves: On dead Quercus leave
12-05-2024 11:48
Michel HairaudBonjour , Voici une récolte d'une Rhytismataceae
Is this G umbratile.
Thanks
Mal
Zotto
Mal
Hi Malcolm, Zotto:
The morphology of the spores (guttules) and paraphyses is not G. fallax.
The stipe looks smooth, fit into our concept of G. umbratile.
Best regards.
Sabino Arauzo.
And yes indeed, in G. fallax I saw the spores with large drops with some small around, but here they are multiguttulate.
In your work, Sabino, G. nigritum and G. umbratile, are synonyms, and you figured a multiguttulate spore. But my cf. umbratile HB6543 has gutules like fallax and also hyaline spores inside the asci. I compared it otherwise with G. (Hemileucoglossum) elongatum.
Zotto
Hi Zotto:
I have not seen amorphous brown material in paraphyses of G umbratile or closest species. H. elongatum has ephitecium and stipe hairy.
I think that HB6543 belongs to G. fallax - starbaeckii group.
Sabino.
I only wonder why in my HB 1217 no exudate is shown, perhaps I overlooked.
Zotto